We’ve Had Enough Witch Hunts

We’ve Had Enough Witch Hunts

Nothing succeeds like failure.


Nothing succeeds like failure. Suddenly, everyone wants to grant the FBI and other intelligence agencies even more power despite the fact that they failed so spectacularly to utilize the expansive powers they had to head off terrorism before September 11. In a sign of mass impotent rage, liberal columnists and politicians are joining right-wing talk show blatherers in insisting the FBI not be “hamstrung” by the restraints of civil liberty.

First to go? Freedom from discrimination based on ethnicity, race or nationality. Racial profiling, popular since the Dark Ages, is again in vogue. Consider Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-Calif.) comments Sunday that to prevent terrorism “one isn’t going to look for blond Norwegians” and that “the racial profiling debate has [had]…a chilling impact” on the FBI.

The truth is that the bureau was hamstrung not by constitutional limits on its powers but rather by incompetence and bureaucratic arrogance at the organization’s top, which ignored ample warnings from below that something terrifying was afoot. Furthermore, the FBI’s parent bureaucracy, the Justice Department, was itself hobbled by Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft, who remained steadfastly focused on the so-called war on drugs despite urgent warnings from the previous Administration that terrorism was the main law enforcement problem.

The rest of the Bush Administration was equally distracted before September 11, focusing on an illusory promise of missile defense rather than on the hard reality of terrorism. Former White House officials have told me that despite the passionate warnings of Richard Clarke, a top anti-terrorism official under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, the President’s Cabinet went the first eight months of his Administration without discussing terrorist threats.

The killing of thousands of people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania on September 11 got their attention, though. Ashcroft charged the Hill to demand–and receive–sweeping new law enforcement powers under the USA Patriot Act, hastily passed by a stunned Congress. He didn’t, however, admit under congressional questioning that his FBI had ample warnings from field agents that a great many suspicious men were training in US flight schools or that FBI headquarters had failed to act on the reports.

More recently, Ashcroft has approved changes in the FBI’s internal regulations to permit increased spying on Americans, deceitfully shifting the onus for the failure to protect society from the incompetence of the Justice Department and the CIA to the alleged deviousness of John Q. Public. These new powers intrude on the lives of law-abiding citizens and add nothing that would have helped prevent the terrorist attacks.

Take, for instance, Feinstein’s call for the FBI to engage in racial profiling of Arab Americans: Police departments across the country have found such tactics alienate otherwise loyal minority communities whose cooperation is indispensable to investigations, and it also wastes limited resources. Consider the FBI budget and manpower used to hound Taiwanese-born Los Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee for five years without finding evidence of spying.

Meanwhile, for more than a decade, FBI headquarters harbored the biggest spy of all, top agent and Soviet mole Robert Hanssen. Perhaps the FBI should racially profile straight white males like Hanssen? Of course that will never happen, anymore than it did during WWII when the Feds were unwilling to round up Hitler’s extensive fifth column in the German American community, even as apolitical Japanese-American gardeners were sent to concentration camps.

If we were to be honest in making the case for profiling, we would go after Saudi Arabians and their business partners and other associates in this country. The September 11 attacks were–from Osama bin Laden to fifteen of the nineteen hijackers to the money that supported them–an operation with top-to-bottom links to Saudi Arabia, a kingdom our military has protected for half a century and which enjoys close ties with Bush’s family. Instead of harassing loyal Arab Americans, the FBI would be better advised to squeeze executives from US corporations, such as the Carlyle Group and Bechtel, that have extensive ties to the Saudis.

What we don’t need is a witch hunt against the American people, ferreting through their private lives or detaining them because of their ethnicity. If there is a group that should be looked at closely, and with suspicion, it is the top officials of this Administration, whose indifference and incompetence before September 11 may have permitted an incredible tragedy.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy