2 Progressives Are Fighting to Represent Chicago in Congress

2 Progressives Are Fighting to Represent Chicago in Congress

2 Progressives Are Fighting to Represent Chicago in Congress

But is the race between Chuy Garcia and Carlos Ramirez-Rosa a sign of progressive strength—or weakness?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

There are some people who’ll tell you that the race shaping up to succeed Representative Luis Gutierrez in Illinois’s 4th congressional district is simply an indication of how dominant progressives have become in Chicago. The fact that Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, the challenger who forced Mayor Rahm Emanuel into a runoff in 2015, and Carlos Ramirez-Rosa, the young alderman who has been the most prominent thorn in Emanuel’s side since his own election to the City Council that year, have both filed petitions is, according to this view, an embarrassment of political riches that should be cause for celebration on the left.

It would certainly be pretty to think so. Electing either man would be a huge improvement for the district—a headphones-shaped gerrymander connecting the Puerto Rican neighborhoods in the city’s north side with Mexican districts south of the Loop to produce a reliable Latino majority. Despite his long membership in the Congressional Progressive Caucus and his close association with Harold Washington’s reforms, Gutierrez has never shown much appetite for fighting City Hall, having been a loyal backer of Richard M. Daley and having, more recently, endorsed Emanuel. By this account also, the mayor’s relief at seeing Garcia, his most threatening opponent, taken off the board is purely coincidental.

More cynical souls, however, will point to a rally last week—in which Gutierrez, who during the 2016 primary campaign gleefully functioned as Hilary Clinton’s local attack dog, at one point saying he wasn’t sure Bernie Sanders “likes immigrants,” anointed Garcia, a key Sanders surrogate—as evidence not of progressive strength but of weakness. This view, sadly, was only strengthened when Sanders himself endorsed Garcia—before the Chicago Our Revolution group even had a chance to poll its membership.

It’s not that the endorsement itself was a surprise—or that there was anything untoward in Sanders’s supporting Chuy, who backed his presidential candidacy when the Vermonter was still polling in single digits, and who has had a long, distinguished career fighting for immigrants, workers’ rights, universal health care, and other progressive causes. But as the most powerful progressive in the country, who ran on the slogan “Not me, us,” it would have been nice to see Sanders even pretending to put movement building ahead of personal loyalty. Particularly for millennial activists who, inspired by Ramirez-Rosa, have flocked to join the Democratic Socialists of America, and who helped Sanders pile up 61 percent of the vote—one of his biggest majorities in the state—in the alderman’s 35th Ward.

Instead the current picture is of the local left in disarray, with Reclaim Chicago, the People’s Lobby, and United Working Families all currently reduced to anxious silence in the hope that the contest between their two champions doesn’t get ugly. Which, sadly, is far from impossible. Such was the growing reputation of Ramirez-Rosa that in September the first-term alderman was tapped as a running mate by Daniel Biss, the state senator running as a progressive challenger to J.B. Pritzker, the billionaire venture capitalist who’s considered the leading contender for the Democratic nomination for governor. Ramirez-Rosa’s candidacy for lieutenant governor lasted less than a week, however, when Biss dropped him over the DSA member’s refusal to disavow the group’s support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement on Israel/Palestine. Last week, when Garcia was asked whether there were any substantive policy differences between him and Ramirez-Rosa, he replied that one area where “we may have a little nuance is on the question of Israel and BDS,” which he said he opposes.

There were just six days left to file petitions when Gutierrez withdrew in favor of Garcia, who submitted over 15,000 names—far in excess of the 864 required by law and far ahead of the 5,000 submitted by Ramirez Rosa, or by Sol Flores, a community activist who is also the only woman in the race. If this early test is an indication of relative strength, Garcia should cruise to the nomination. Clem Balanoff, a longtime Garcia advisor (who is also Illinois chair of Our Revolution) says that as far as he’s concerned there is no rancor between the two progressives. “Our only fight is with the machine,” he said, noting that Flores had served on Emanuel’s transition team.

Still, if voters blame this last minute game of musical chairs on Emanuel, Garcia may come to regret accepting Gutierrez’s endorsement. On the other hand, if Garcia and Ramirez-Rosa keep their aim on Chicago’s machine, whichever of the two doesn’t go to Washington would make a fine mayor.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x