Tracking the Superdelegates

Tracking the Superdelegates

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With Hillary Clinton’s wins yesterday in Ohio and Texas, the Democratic presidential selection process is guaranteed to go on until at least the Pennsylvania primary on April 22 but likely much longer, possibly even into the summer.

The closeness of the race also raises the specter that the superdelegates, generally ignored and unknown, could play the pivotal role in selecting the eventual nominee. (Read Ari Berman’s recent magazine piece for the story of why a group of elite unpledged party operatives and elected officials not chosen by primary voters could be in position to decide the outcome.)

What the superdelegates should do, and whether they are bound by any principles, is now the subject of fierce debate. Geraldine Ferraro, in a New York Times op-ed, argued that the SDs should decide based on their own, personal sense of who would make the best candidate. John Lewis said he felt compelled to switch his allegiance from Clinton to Obama after his constituents voted overwhelmingly in favor of Obama, contending that SDs should reflect the will of the people.

Whatever you think, it’s critical to have accurate information on how the selection process is being conducted, a proposition on which the new Superdelegate Transparency Project was founded. A combined effort of DemConWatch, LiteraryOutpost, OpenLeft, HuffPost’s OffTheBus and Congresspedia–a project of the Sunlight Foundation and the Center for Media and Democracy, the STP calls itself “the most thorough, accurate and transparent reporting on how superdelegate endorsements compare to popular vote results and delegate counts–district by district.”

The effort is definitely the only citizen-led, grassroots attempt to bring transparency to the superdelegate process. STP also features profiles of and interviews with superdelegates, which have been donated to the site from HuffPost’s OffTheBus team of citizen journalists. The aim of the project is to open up the Democratic nomination process, and to gauge what effect the superdelegates have on the nomination. Want to help out? Click here.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x