Tony Kushner’s Intelligent Homosexuals

Tony Kushner’s Intelligent Homosexuals

Tony Kushner’s Intelligent Homosexuals

Without turning into sentimental left-wing pageantry, Kushner’s new play illuminates radicalism and makes art of sectarian dreams and failures.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Why should you be rushing down to The Public Theater in New York to bear witness to Tony Kushner’s roaring new play, The Intelligent Homosexual’s Guide to Capitalism and Socialism With a Key to the Scriptures? Not just because iHomo offers the chance to banquet on rich and delectable passions and ideas, washed down with lashings of wit—what Kushner play doesn’t do that? Not just because it’s the only play this season in which you’ll hear a theologian, a sex worker and a real estate lawyer take rueful measure of the intimate brutalities their respective objects of desire have committed against them. Not just because it’s the only play in which you’ll see Garibaldi’s head used as a sledgehammer. Go because at a time when citizens feel trapped in the eternal present of the twenty-four-hour news cycle, iHomo’s big argumentative poetry screams out that history matters.

iHomo is a hippodrome of galloping contradictions—erotic, spiritual, ideological. Lifelong communist Gus Marcantonio, a 75-year-old retired longshoreman living in Carroll Gardens, Brooklyn, has convened his sister, Clio, and his three adult children for a vote on whether he should commit suicide—but first he wants to sell his brownstone before the housing market gets worse. Clio left a convent of contemplative nuns in Peru to join Andes Maoists on guerrilla campaigns and now ministers to the poor in a New Jersey housing project. Gus’s daughter, Empty, is a principled labor lawyer who secretly wants to abandon her wife, Maeve, a pregnant theologian about to go into labor herself. His son Pill can’t finish a labor-history dissertation begun more than two decades ago and cheats on his husband, Paul (another theologian, but an atheist one), by squandering a small fortune of his sister’s savings to buy assignations with Eli, a Yale-alum hustler. His building-contractor youngest son V, meets Gus’s torrents of Marxist theory with law-and-order exasperation, yet looks after the old man’s material needs with a studiously invisible tenderness.

iHomo lives at the intersection of the garrulous family dramas of Eugene O’Neill and Arthur Miller and the audacious societal problem plays of George Bernard Shaw and Henrik Ibsen. The Marcantonios’ brownstone, purchased in the 1920s with immigrant sweat, is densely packed with the books, music and memories of the intense working-class autodidacts who have called it home. Memories of a more baleful kind now devour Gus’s days: though he claims he’s doing it because of Alzheimer’s, Gus means his suicide to be a ticket out of a secret shame that mocks his proletarian values.

Sex, however, is also conveniently located at that intersection of property and memory. For the passionate mortals in iHomo, sex is the site at which the contradictions between public avowals and private yearnings are sharpest. As with labor unions, the sexual unions these characters attempt reckon with questions of belonging, of who owns what, of who commodifies whom, of which side are you on. Any embrace of another with a dream of mutual transformation may run you the risk of undermining everything you stand for.

Without ever turning into a sentimental left-wing pageant, iHomo lovingly and unsparingly illuminates immigrant and labor radicalism and makes art of sectarian dreams and failures, linking Kushner’s protagonists to a long line of American visionary communities (even Mary Baker Eddy and Christian Science get a nod). iHomo is opening in New York at a moment when the kind of labor struggle that animates the Marcantonio family is playing out in Wisconsin and across the country; though set in 2007, Kushner’s play arrives in the middle of a Democratic presidency in which anyone who hopes for social justice inevitably must metabolize a daily dose of disappointment over the constricted terms of debate—whether over the budget, Guantánamo or war. One of the most remarkable things about iHomo’s loudmouthed, fallible characters is that, despite their proclivity for hair-trigger denunciations, they share a sense of belonging to one another that is more than a Godot-style clinging to company in hopes of warding off misery. iHomo’s fragile community may feel built on fraught history and beautiful theories, but it is one whose heart may still contain enough filaments of joy and humor to light the way to hope again.

Will the kind of theater reviewer who gets sulky at hearing the C-word—communism—dismiss iHomo with a petulant wave of the hand? Herman Melville, one of Kushner’s literary gods, once wrote that “There are hardly five critics in America; and several of them are asleep.” Even if Melville’s head count is still accurate, the wide-awake ones should relish that rarest of theater delights—a big, noisy, sexy play in which argument is hot and throbbing.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x