The Real Election Fraud

The Real Election Fraud

The danger to American democracy stems from Republican efforts to suppress the vote.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As he continues to slip in the polls, Donald Trump is claiming the election is “rigged” against him: Dead people are casting ballots from the grave. Illegal immigrants are pouring over the border to vote for Hillary Clinton. Democrats are voting 10 times each in “certain areas,” like inner-city Philadelphia. He even suggested, in the final presidential debate, that he might not accept the results of the election if Clinton wins.

This is nonsense. Voter fraud is a very small problem in American elections, and voter impersonation, which Republican-backed voter-ID laws purport to address, is exceedingly rare. There have been only 31 allegations of voter impersonation since 2000, out of 1 billion votes cast—meaning more people are struck by lightning than impersonate another voter at the polls.

Yet Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric has already had damaging consequences. According to one poll, 73 percent of Republicans believe the election could be stolen from him. The Trump campaign is recruiting “Trump Election Observers” to “Stop Crooked Hillary From Rigging This Election!” And some of his supporters are explicitly calling for racial profiling at the polls against “Mexicans. Syrians. People who can’t speak American,” as Steve Webb, a 61-year-old carpenter from Fairfield, Ohio, told The Boston Globe.

Some prominent Republicans, like John McCain, have denounced Trump’s statements and his refusal to accept the election outcome if he doesn’t win. But when it comes to voter fraud, Trump is simply pouring gasoline on a fire his own party created.

The GOP’s fraud crusade dates back to the 2000 election in Florida, when Republicans disenfranchised Democratic-leaning voters—by illegally purging thousands from the voting rolls, for example—and then brazenly labeled Democrats as rampant cheaters. Manufacturing a controversy over voter fraud became an effective way to build support for new efforts to limit access to the ballot, like strict voter-ID laws, cuts to early voting, and shutting down voter-registration drives.

The real danger to American democracy stems from Republican efforts to make it harder to vote. If there’s any rigging happening in the election, it’s this: 14 states have new voting restrictions in effect for the first time in 2016, which will be the first presidential election in 50 years without the full protections of the Voting Rights Act.

The truth is that voter suppression is a much bigger problem than voter fraud. In Wisconsin, Republicans haven’t presented a single case of voter impersonation in court, yet the state’s strict voter-ID law could disenfranchise 300,000 registered voters this year. “A preoccupation with mostly phantom election fraud leads to real incidents of disenfranchisement, which undermine rather than enhance confidence in elections,” wrote Federal District Court Judge James Peterson. As The Nation’s Ari Berman reported, one registered voter in Wisconsin, a naturalized US citizen since the age of 8, was told to spend $345 on her naturalization papers to get a photo ID to vote.

The watchdog group Democracy North Carolina documented more than 2,300 cases of voters whose ballots were rejected in 2014 after the state eliminated same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting. That was 1,150 times greater than the two cases of voter impersonation committed in North Carolina from 2002 to 2012, out of 35 million votes cast.

Let’s be very clear: It’s incredibly unlikely there will be widespread voter fraud on Election Day. But there will be eligible voters who are turned away from the polls. That’s the true threat to election integrity we should be focusing on. It’s not enough for Republicans to denounce Trump’s rigged-election comments. They must renounce their own party’s voter-suppression efforts if they want to stop Trumpism from spreading further after the election.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x