The Cold Warriors Strike Back

The Cold Warriors Strike Back

In Washington, London, Turkey, Kiev, and even Moscow, opponents of a possible US–Russian détente on Ukraine and Syria demonstrate again their power to thwart the process of negotiations.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian Cold War. (Previous installments are at TheNation.com.) Last week, the discussion focused on promising meetings and statements, initiated by Secretary of State Kerry, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, German Chancellor Merkel, French President Hollande, and Russian President Putin, to negotiate an end to the Ukrainian civil/proxy war and to reconcile US and Russian policies in Syria. This week’s discussion focused on high-level attempts to undermine that process, among them a UK report alleging (without facts or logic) that Putin was behind the radiation assassination of a former Russian security agent in London, followed by a US Treasury Department public charge that Putin was personally “corrupt”—and thus an unfit partner; Vice President Biden’s statement in Turkey that Washington was prepared to undertake a “military solution” to the conflict in Syria; and Ukrainian President Poroshenko’s continuing refusal to implement requirements for negotiating the ongoing war there. In each capital, proponents of negotiations, including Putin himself, are being accused of preparing to “sell out” one or the other side in the conflicts. Meanwhile, Cohen points out, the new Cold War continues to deepen, spread and become more militarized with the ongoing shredding of cooperative relations built up over decades and accompanied by a renewed nuclear arms race. He ends by expressing astonishment that this most dangerous international crisis in decades, from Ukraine, Europe and Turkey to the Middle East, has received virtually no serious attention in the current American presidential campaigns, not even in the “debates,” apart from a few bumper sticker proclamations by the candidates and uninformed questions by the moderators.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x