Taking Heat for Sweatshops

Taking Heat for Sweatshops

Despite its efforts to silence whistleblowers, Wal-Mart remains under fire for abusing its workers.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Last week, we noted that Wal-Mart was fighting hard to get away with firing whistleblowers. This weekend, the Associated Press reported that James W. Lynn, of Searcy, Arkansas, is suing the company for just that, charging that he was fired for reporting poor working conditions at Wal-Mart’s offices in Honduras and Guatemala. Lynn, who was Wal-Mart’s global services manager until his 2002 firing, charges that Moon Chung, the retailer’s general manager in Honduras, pressured employees to sanitize internal reports on supplier factory conditions. Lynn also saw serious abuses in Honduran factories making Wal-Mart goods: violations of local wage and hour laws, lack of bathrooms and drinking water and padlocked fire exits. When he told his superiors in Arkansas about these problems, Lynn says, he was fired. Guess Wal-Mart’s keeping Baby Scalia busy!

Lynn’s lawsuit comes at a time when Wal-Mart is feeling some well-deserved heat for its gross exploitation of the workers–mostly young women–making its cheap products. Last week, Dateline ran an excellent hidden-camera report on the conditions endured by workers in Bangladesh who sew the stripes onto $13 pants sold at Wal-Mart, finding they worked eighteen-hour days and were physically and verbally abused by factory bosses and cheated out of overtime pay. The National Labor Committee, which helped with Dateline‘s investigation, is demanding that Wal-Mart pay garment workers 20 cents more per garment–the amount these women say would allow them to live decently and provide for their families. Click here to find out what you can do.

No matter where they fall in the supply chain, workers are angry at Wal-Mart. On June 24, employees in some Asda distribution centers in Britain–which are owned by Wal-Mart–will go on strike over pay and work conditions and over threatened layoffs affecting roughly 300 workers.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x