A Subprime Bailout

A Subprime Bailout

Congress bails out the banks, but needs to do far more for homeowners devastated by the subprime crisis.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As we go to press, a sense of urgency about the nation’s housing catastrophe seems finally to have trickled up to Congress, which is making a rare bipartisan push before the July 4 recess to pass a relief measure aimed at homeowners. It’s about time. As early as 2003, reality-inclined economists sounded the alarm over the hyperinflated housing bubble’s impending burst. But it wasn’t until Wall Street took a hit last year–threatening a worldwide financial meltdown–that the government swung into action, and then only to bail out the lenders and banks that got us into this mess. Meanwhile, more than 1.1 million homes are in foreclosure, and housing prices have taken a 15.3 percent tumble over the past year–the worst drop in history–sticking almost 9 million Americans with homes worth less than their mortgages. In cities like Detroit and Las Vegas, whole neighborhoods are ghost towns, with more houses boarded up than occupied.

Yet free market ideologues have stymied relief efforts by claiming that to rescue homeowners would be to reward speculators who lied on their mortgage applications to make a fast buck. No equivalent amount of tough love was offered to the really reckless speculators–the bankers who bundled subprime loans and traditional mortgages into securities and traded them to third-party investors on the deregulated global market. This quest to maximize paper profits drove the mortgage industry to make shoddy loans to first-time buyers as well as longtime homeowners, who were lured into exploding-interest-rate mortgages they couldn’t afford or did not need. What happened, in short, was not consumer error but systemic market fraud and failure.

The people suffering most from this scheme’s collapse are not members of the investor class but folks who believed that homeownership would be their ticket to middle-class stability, as it had been for the previous generation. As Kai Wright’s article “The Subprime Swindle,” on page 11, reveals, the gutting of the American dream of homeownership has disproportionately devastated minorities; the total loss of wealth for people of color due to the subprime crisis could reach $213 billion, including $92 billion for African-Americans and $98 billion for Latinos. And, because minority wealth is so dependent on home equity, the crush of foreclosures represents not just the immediate loss of homes but the razing of wealth and opportunity for generations to come.

For Americans who have already had their meager economic security eviscerated, Congress’s awakening is too late, and for those on the cusp, it is still too little. The pending legislation, which Bush has threatened to veto, creates a refinancing system that is voluntary for lenders and hamstrung by large borrower’s fees and red tape. It does nothing to reform the securities market, opting instead for borrower counseling and stricter disclosure requirements. But such tinkering around the edges will not fix this disaster. What is needed is a massive federal program, akin to the Resolution Trust Corporation but designed to aid debtors instead of creditors, to keep low-income Americans in their homes. Houses in default could be placed into federal receivership in which owners would make payments equivalent to rent without accruing equity. When the market settles, these mortgages could be renegotiated at fair rates, or the homes could be turned into public housing. Finally, lenders must be held accountable for the loans they make, not just now in the ensuing sell-off but permanently, by extending liability throughout the chain so that everyone who issues or holds a mortgage has a reason to make sure that the housing market is built on a strong foundation.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x