Student Boycott of Sabra Hummus Blocked

Student Boycott of Sabra Hummus Blocked

Student Boycott of Sabra Hummus Blocked

In spite of student support for a boycott of a brand of hummus made by a company students argue is complicit in human rights abuses, DePaul University’s Fair Business Practices Committee (FBPC) concluded there wasn’t "sufficient grounds" for a boycott.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

DePaul University students pushing to replace Sabra hummus with an alternative brand in the campus dining halls have been blocked by the university’s Fair Business Practices Committee (FBPC).

FBPC made this decision in spite of the fact that in last week’s student elections 77 percent of students participating voted to remove Sabra from DePaul campus shelves, an achievement that is in large part due to a campaign by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), which used documentation from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the United Nations to demonstrate that the brand’s parent company, Strauss Group, supports two units of the Israeli military engaged in repression of the Palestinian people.

FBPC argued that the “Strauss Group’s support for the brigades is not material because it does not specifically send weapons,” even though Strauss Group states it provides money and supplies to two brigades which advocacy groups allege have committed human rights violations against civilians.

Campus debate over Sabra hummus has been going on for six months between students, staff and faculty representatives and the latest decision doesn’t seem likely to end the issue. The SJP is already criticizing the FBPC for failing to take their group’s research into consideration and campus activism continues, as this video by SJP makes clear. Watch this space for further developments.
 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x