Slumdog President

Slumdog President

Many Indians believe Obama’s victory makes all things possible for people of color–but for all the good will, there is little mention of India’s ever-present racism.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

AP Images
New Delhi, India, Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2008.

Bangalore

“He’ll never win,” declared my father-in-law with glum certainty, as I sat sweltering in the Indian heat in early September. “The Americans may want to elect him, but in the end they won’t do it. He’s a good man, but he’s black.”

More noteworthy than his cynicism is his unstinting support for a man who shares so little of his worldview. My father-in-law isn’t exactly a flaming liberal, yet like most educated middle- to upper-class Indians, he has developed a firm, near-irrational affection for a man known entirely through mostly admiring news articles and sound bites.

Over the past six months, the Indian media have displayed the classic signs of Obamamania that have become so familiar to most Americans: glowing editorials marking his “historic” nomination and election, an endless stream of advice from sympathetic pundits (including one columnist who suggested Obama take his cues from the Indian cricket team, no less), quirky stories about devoted fans (who in India seemed to prefer organizing pujas to meet-ups) and a tabloidlike obsession with his personality, his wife and kids, and most recently his hot bod.

The enthusiasm reflected in ad hoc street interviews and the rare opinion poll may not be representative–not in a country that remains largely rural–but it is hard to dismiss. Among those who know and care about US elections, Obama was indeed the favorite. Most reporters searched in vain for a McCain supporter–at least anyone who would admit to it–at the many election parties organized in cities like Delhi and Bangalore.

The level of good will is all the more remarkable for a man who may well end up–as most analysts here worry–on the wrong side of the issues the Indian middle class holds most dear: outsourcing, the Bush-sponsored nuclear deal and Kashmir/Pakistan. Most editorials cited Obama’s opposition to Bush’s policies, the very policies that made the soon-to-be former president more popular in India than in most other places in the world. These doubts about an Obama administration have not been ignored. The same editorials are laced with unease about his policy positions, and his passing suggestion that the United States should step in to help resolve the Kashmir dispute raised hackles all around.

But the skepticism has so far been overwhelmed by the undisguised pleasure of seeing a brown-skinned underdog triumph against all odds over a white establishment. While the narrative has universal appeal–not just for Indians and not just because they’re not white–the affection for Obama in India is tied inextricably to his race. The day after his victory, all the major newspaper headlines told the same story: Obama Reclaims American Dream; A Dream Alive in Our Time; Change Has Come to America; Race Ends in Historic Win: Dark Knight in White House. Responding to a ten-ton sand sculpture of Obama’s face created by a local artist and a team of schoolchildren in Puri, one local told reporters, “It is natural that everybody wants change. He is the historical figure in the world itself, as no black person has ever become the US president.”

Many Indians believe Obama’s victory makes all things possible for people of color everywhere–including the many American grandchildren, nieces, nephews and cousins who, thanks to globalization, are part of the Indian extended family. “My granddaughter can now be president of the United States,” boasted a university professor who was shopping at the local mall in Bangalore, echoing the sentiments of my mother, an aunt and her neighbor.

And yet for all the rhetoric about America’s racist history, Indians have preferred to avoid any mention of our ever-present racism. There’s been nary a word on the cognitive dissonance between all this Obama-love in a culture that refers to people of African origin as habshis, an epithet as offensive as the N-word. Like all well-indoctrinated postcolonial subjects, most Indians regard Africans with contempt for being poor, “backward” and, above all, black–a cardinal sin in a nation obsessed with skin color. (“Fairness” creams remain the top-selling cosmetic on the Indian market.) Sure, Obama was one of “us” when he was running for president. But he wouldn’t be if he were one of the many African students in, say, Delhi struggling to rent an apartment or hail a cab.

If the Obama candidacy evoked an overdue and necessary discussion about racism in America, perhaps it’s time that it did the same in other parts of the world–be it in India, Russia or France. There are plenty of cute and heartwarming stories about Indians and Obama, but a more telling example is the response of our cook, the well-meaning, kind, chocolate-skinned Mary. When I told her a black man was now the president of the United States, she looked confused and a little uncertain. “And is this a good thing?” she asked. Answering that question is likely as good a place to start as any.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x