The Senate’s Rejection of Debo Adegbile Sets a Dangerous Precedent

The Senate’s Rejection of Debo Adegbile Sets a Dangerous Precedent

The Senate’s Rejection of Debo Adegbile Sets a Dangerous Precedent

The successful smear campaign against him undermined a key principle of our justice system: that everyone is entitled to legal representation.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

It was a promising sign last November when the Obama administration nominated Debo Adegbile, one of the country’s most respected civil rights lawyers, to head the Justice Department’s civil rights division. Adegbile spent twelve years at the NAACP’s Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF), where he skillfully litigated a wide range of civil rights issues, including twice defending the Voting Rights Act before the Supreme Court. He was endorsed by prominent lawyers on both sides of the aisle, including Paul Clement, the former solicitor general under George W. Bush. His experience would have been a vital asset, especially as the Justice Department navigates the fallout from the Court’s decision last June gutting a key section of the VRA.

Instead, Adegbile’s nomination suffered an unceremonious defeat on March 5, when seven Democrats joined with every Republican senator to sink him. Adegbile was the victim of a vicious smear campaign, attacked because the LDF had challenged the death sentence of Mumia Abu-Jamal on the grounds of improper jury selection. The US Court of Appeals sided with the LDF twice, commuting Abu-Jamal’s sentence to life without parole in 2012. But despite Adegbile’s limited involvement in the case, and the LDF’s success in court, his name and the words “cop killer” were plastered across the right-wing blogosphere and on Fox News. An aggressive lobbying campaign by the Fraternal Order of Police, aided by Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey, convinced skittish red-state Democrats as well as two in the Philadelphia media market—Pennsylvania’s Bob Casey and Delaware’s Chris Coons—to join with Republicans in torpedoing Adegbile.

His defeat sets a number of dangerous precedents. The first is the assumption that lawyers can be considered responsible for the actions of their clients. A bedrock principle of the American legal system—that everyone is entitled to a fair trial, including legal representation—was turned on its head in the attack on Adegbile. He also suffered from a brazen double standard. While in private practice, John Roberts worked pro bono to defend a Florida man convicted of murdering eight people, but that didn’t stop the Senate from confirming him as chief justice. Senator Tom Harkin suggested that the reason is because Roberts is white and Adegbile is black (his father is Nigerian and his mother is Irish). Whether or not race was a factor, race-based politics certainly was. His civil rights advocacy, in the eyes of many GOP senators, made him a liability to head the civil rights division. So an oil industry lobbyist can become interior secretary (Gale Norton) and an anti-union activist can become labor secretary (Elaine Chao), but apparently a civil rights lawyer cannot become head of the civil rights division.

Although it was created under Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, conservatives have been trying to weaken the civil rights division ever since the Nixon years. The Bush administration stacked it with ideologues who overruled and purged career lawyers. Adegbile’s expertise, especially on voting rights, led GOP senators to oppose him at a time when Republicans are passing new voting restrictions across the country. As majority leader Harry Reid said of his Republican colleagues, “They don’t want people to vote.”

The Senate blocked Adegbile the same week that the country observed the forty-ninth anniversary of “Bloody Sunday,” when Alabama state troopers brutally beat voting rights activists attempting to march from Selma to Montgomery. We’ve come a long way on civil rights, but the defeat of Adegbile shows that we still have a long way to go.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x