Samantha Power and the Danger of Gotcha Politics

Samantha Power and the Danger of Gotcha Politics

Samantha Power and the Danger of Gotcha Politics

Samantha Power, the able foreign policy advisor to Barack Obama who referred to Hillary Clinton as a “monster,” has quit her role with the Obama campaign.

That’s too bad, because Power has always been more open and honest than most key players you will find in or around presidential campaigns.

Of course, the off-hand remark by Power in a discussion recorded by a Scottish journalist was politically incorrect — both because it was hurtful to Clinton, someone the Anna Lindh Professor of Practice of Global Leadership and Public Policy at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government has known for a number of years, and because they suggested an ineptness on the part of the Obama campaign at precisely the time when it did the most harm.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Samantha Power, the able foreign policy advisor to Barack Obama who referred to Hillary Clinton as a “monster,” has quit her role with the Obama campaign.

That’s too bad, because Power has always been more open and honest than most key players you will find in or around presidential campaigns.

Of course, the off-hand remark by Power in a discussion recorded by a Scottish journalist was politically incorrect — both because it was hurtful to Clinton, someone the Anna Lindh Professor of Practice of Global Leadership and Public Policy at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government has known for a number of years, and because they suggested an ineptness on the part of the Obama campaign at precisely the time when it did the most harm.

Power’s comment about Clinton was a rough one: “She is a monster, too — that is off the record — she is stooping to anything… You just look at her and think, ‘Ergh.’ But if you are poor and she is telling you some story about how Obama is going to take your job away, maybe it will be more effective. The amount of deceit she has put forward is really unattractive.”

But let’s be a little serious here: What Power said is no different from what campaigners say about their opponents on a daily basis — except perhaps for the use of the rather sophisticated word “monster” as opposed to the usual explicatives. It’s just that Power said it in a setting where her attempt to take the word back with a “that is off the record” grasp was not going to work.

Ultimately, what was most striking about the whole incident was the genuine remorse Power showed.

Listening to the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide (2003) explain her intemperate remark reminded me of the danger of a politics that tosses anyone aside when they make a meaningless mistake like this one.

Here’s what Power told an Irish TV reporter when asked if she regretted her remarks: “Of course I regret them, I can’t even believe they came out of my mouth. The campaign was getting very tense, and I — in every public appearance I’ve ever made talking about Senator Clinton, I have sung her praises as the leader she’s been, the intellect. She’s also incredibly warm, funny. I’ve spent time with her. I think that I just had a very weak moment in seeing some of the tactics, it seems, that were getting employed. I was just afraid really that the campaign would not stay at the level it had been on and I let out in a wave of frustration.”

Speaking of Clinton, Power told the Irish network RTE, “I’m just truly sorry at the harm it may have caused her…”

And Power was frank enough to add that she was sorry for the harm she’d caused the Obama campaign.

Of the whole controversy, Power said, “It’s not good and it’s 100 percent thoroughly my fault. I apologize. I regret it. I wish I could go back in time, mainly because (the comments) don’t reflect my feelings about Senator Clinton… I think just, I’m a bit of a political rookie. I’m a policy-person, a scholar and new to campaigning. Perhaps maybe the heat of it got to me a little bit and I over-reacted to something that I had heard. But, again, it’s no excuse.”

She actually said it was the right move for the Obama camp to distance itself from her. “The campaign will be better for maintaining the high ground,” the scholar suggested.

Power’s still backing Obama. But she noted, “if he doesn’t get the nomination I will be backing Senator Clinton with the same enthusiasm.”

“We’re Democrats,” Power added, “and that’s why my comments were particularly hurtful and, frankly, just very, very stupid.”

Now, I have differed with Power on plenty of issues over the years. And I have not always been entirely impressed with Obama or his campaign. But I sure don’t see much to celebrate in the latest turn on 2008’s long campaign trail.

Power was so frank and remorseful that I was left feeling that this is not the sort of person we should want to see pushed away from the political process.

No good comes from sidelining frank and outspoken “rookies.” Obama and Clinton both need more aides like her. And we all need to accept that campaigns and campaigners can make honest mistakes — indeed, the mistakes are what tell us these are human endeavors, as opposed to mere spin machines.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x