Rising to the Surface

Rising to the Surface

It’s not easy making sense.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

One of the chief requirements of a cryptic clue, as all solvers and constructors know, is a meaningful surface. You can’t just string a bunch of words together in a row, willy-nilly, and pass it off as part of a legitimate cryptic.

But beneath that simple directive lies a whole slew of difficult borderline cases and tricky judgment calls. That’s because “meaningful” isn’t a simple binary attribute; it exists along a spectrum, and constructors have to figure out where to draw their own line. At one end of the spectrum is pure gibberish, while at the other are sentences or phrases so natural they hardly seem like clues at all. Years ago, one of us wrote this clue:
   ACCURSED Goddamn cue cards got mixed up (8)
and was tickled when a solver pronounced it “the cryptic clue most likely to have been spoken in real life.”

It’s the area in between those extremes that can be treacherous. In general, we try to write clues that are syntactically sound and whose meaning doesn’t seem too blatantly forced. That often leads us into conversations like this:

—I like the wordplay here, but I don’t quite understand the surface.

—Well, there’s a macaw on the tennis court, see, and she’s got a purple cigar that won’t stay lit because… Yeah, I’ll change it.

But we still wind up with clues whose naturalness may be debatable. For example:

MILLIONS Reversible, thin coat for big cat: that’s a lot of money (8)

OREGANO Herb donuts captivate Shakespearean princess (7)

PARODY Weird Al’s specialty punishment: interrupting compensation (6)

Other clues have a wacky surface that is intended to be part of their charm.

PRESERVER Vishnu the maître d’? (9)

RED-BAITER Fire ant, perhaps, consuming the head of Andrew McCarthy, famously (3-6)

SPEED OF LIGHT Swimsuit escape: Einstein thought about it a lot (5,2,5)

And occasionally, a clue will force us so far into the weeds that there’s nothing to do but fess up and laugh about it.

SOUL MUSIC Genre that Aretha Franklin helped popularize in order that Albert Einstein’s hometown is supported by uranium (really—that’s not a typo) (4,5)

This week’s multiple-choice clueing challenge: MILLIONS, OREGANO, or PARODY. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen. And now, four links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines | PDF
• Our e-books (solve past puzzles on your iOS device—many hints provided by the software!)
• A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where every one of our clues is explained in detail. This is also where you can post quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle, as well as ask for hints.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x