Republicans Pass Measure Blocking TSA Unionization

Republicans Pass Measure Blocking TSA Unionization

Republicans Pass Measure Blocking TSA Unionization

House Republicans passed a bill blocking TSA unionization yesterday, fulfilling a long-held goal.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

If anti-labor forces in Washington are nothing else, they are persistent. Yesterday the House of Representatives narrowly passed a Republican amendment to the Department of Homeland Security budget which would prevent thousands of airport screeners from forming a union, a right they won only months ago after a bruising Senate fight.

Employees of the Transportation Security Administration are currently voting in a runoff election to determine whether the American Federation of Government Employees or the National Treasury Employees Union will represent them.

But late Wednesday, Rep. Todd Rokita, a Republican from Indiana, offered an amendment to the Homeland Security bill that would prevent any federal funds from being used for collective bargaining by the TSA, citing national security concerns. “Collective bargaining agreements would hamper the critical nature of TSA agents’ national security responsibilities,” Rokita said on the House floor. “Union demands will unquestionably make our transportation security more costly and less efficient.”

The amendment passed by a narrow 218-205 margin, with 18 Republicans defecting from an otherwise party-line vote. Rokita’s national security rhetoric echoed Republican tactics from a debate in the Senate earlier this year, which narrowly defeated two measures that would have prevented TSA unionization.

AFGE president John Gage told The Nation the union expected the measure would pass, but that he was surprised it was an issue again so soon after having been seemingly resolved in the Senate. “It’s outrageous. It’s already settled,” Gage said. “It doesn’t seem to me that there’s any limit to where some of these people go to restrict worker’s rights, to really go on a rampage against unions.”

Gage was particularly incensed by the national security rhetoric. “It’s an insult to a union members’ patriotism,” he said. “Maybe they don’t realize the people who went up the stairs on 9/11 were union members.”

Terrorism has been the canard of anti-TSA unionization forces since the beginning of the Obama administration. In December 2009, Sen. Jim DeMint placed a hold on President Obama’s nominee to head the TSA, Erroll Southers, as a warning shot against unionization. In a statement about his hold on Southers, DeMint cited the attempted Christmas Day bombing that year as “a perfect example of why the Obama administration should not unionize the TSA.”

Southers eventually withdrew his name from consideration for the job, and the Senate confirmed John Pistole to head the agency. In February of this year, Pistole granted TSA workers the right to unionize. DeMint and Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi both introduced bills in the Senate to block the unionization, but both were narrowly defeated.

Gage said his union will lobby the Senate to remove Rokita’s amendment, and if unsuccessful, will urge President Obama not to sign the bill.

Republicans proposed two other anti-worker amendments to the Homeland Security bill, though both were defeated.

Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona introduced a measure that would have prevented any new construction or other projects undertaken by the Department of Homeland Security from complying with the Davis-Bacon Act, which requires prevailing wages on federal projects. That was defeated 234-183, with the help of 52 Republicans.

Another amendment by Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana would have prevented DHS from mandating Project Labor Agreements on construction projects. PLAs require the government to award public construction projects to unionized firms. That was narrowly defeated, 213-207.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x