Protesting to Protect the Constitution

Protesting to Protect the Constitution

Protesting to Protect the Constitution

Three states (Alaska, Arizona and Hawaii) and 219 cities, towns and counties have passed anti-Patriot Act resolutions, ordinances or ballot initiatives. Hundreds more are in progress.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Three states (Alaska, Arizona and Hawaii) and 219 cities, towns and counties have passed anti-Patriot Act resolutions, ordinances or ballot initiatives. Hundreds more are in progress. On Tuesday, December 2, a rally was held in lower Manhattan in support of Resolution 909, which would add New York City to this list. Two Nation interns attended the rally. Their reports are below.

Hundreds of New Yorkers braved the blustery cold to rally near City Hall in support of City Council Resolution 909 on Tuesday, December 2. The crowd crammed into a long narrow police pen that ran the length of two blocks along lower Broadway to hear speeches from a virtual who’s who of Manhattan politicians. US Congressman Jerrold Nadler, who represents the district that encompasses the rally site as well as the nearby site of the former World Trade Center, spoke, as did New York State Senator Liz Krueger, City Council Deputy Majority Leader Bill Perkins and City Council Speaker Gifford Miller, whose slow movement on the issue is explained well by my colleague Nina in the dispatch below.

Resolution 909 is a proposed resolution before the Council to condemn what critics call the unconstitutionality of the Patriot Act, and requests that city employees do their best to assist New Yorkers targeted by the act as much as possible.

Many unions came out, including the New York Public Library Guild, Local 1930, as well as individual unionists. The rally was also well attended by local media, including TV crews from CBS and WPIX, among others. And, as is frequently the case, a protester’s sign summed up the sentiments of the crowd better than anything else: “Keep your knee-jerk reactionary policies off my bill of rights.”

BEN ADLER


“Dissent is patriotic,” read the podium sign at today’s rally against the Patriot Act. This sentiment was clearly the theme of the day, as speaker after speaker voiced support for the resolution, which calls for the safeguarding of constitutional rights, thanked the crowd for attending, and–of course–bashed Attorney General Ashcroft. Representatives from organizations ranging from the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, to the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys, to the New York Public Library Guild, took to the microphone to add their voices to the rally’s call for “true patriotism.”

Ashcroft was not the only official under attack. City Council Speaker Gifford Miller has not yet brought the resolution to a vote. Tentatively scheduled to speak at the rally, he didn’t arrive until midway through the event, prompting several speakers to demand irately, “Where is Speaker Miller?” Jim Rogers, president of the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys, went further, accusing Miller of preventing the resolution from coming to a fair vote. Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), challenged Miller to “put [his] money where [his] mouth is.” He eventually showed up, offering rhetorical support for the resolution, but not a date for a City Council vote on the measure.

Of the fifty-one City Council members, thirty-one have already signed on to co-sponsor the resolution, and if passed, New York City will join three states and 219 cities, towns and counties who have passed similar resolutions, ordinances or ballot initiatives. According to Udi Ofer, project director of the Bill of Rights Defense Campaign at the NYCLU, if New York City passes the resolution it will send a clear message from New Yorkers to the rest of the country about the widespread attack on civil liberties: “Not in our name.”

NINA ENGLANDER

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x