Progress in Iran Talks: Can We Stop the War-Whooping Now?

Progress in Iran Talks: Can We Stop the War-Whooping Now?

Progress in Iran Talks: Can We Stop the War-Whooping Now?

By softening its rhetoric, the Western side has encouraged the Iranians to come to terms.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. (Reuters/Damir Sagolj.)

Saeed Jalili, the hardest of hardliners in Iran’s ongoing confrontation with the P5+1 over Tehran’s nuclear program, sounded downright upbeat after two days of talks in Almaty, Kazakhstan:

We consider these talks a positive step which could be completed by taking a positive and constructive approach and taking reciprocal steps.… We believe this is a turning point.

The two sides will meet March 18-19 in Istanbul, at a technical level, and the resume at the higher level back in Kazakhstan on April 5-6. The Western side, it appears, softened its demands, which encouraged the Iranian side. The new ideas from the P5+1, including the United States, were “more realistic” and “closer to the Iranian position,” said Jalili. According to The New York Times, the United States dropped its demand that Iran shut its underground enrichment facility at Fordo, which Iran has said that it would never do, and “agreed, in another apparent softening, that Iran could produce and keep a small amount of 20 percent enriched uranium for use in a reactor to produce medical isotopes.”

While the P5+1 did suggest that some, relatively minor sanctions on Iran might be lifted in a preliminary step, the relief offered was rather minor and inconsequential. According to Reuters: Western officials said the offer of sanctions relief included a resumption of trade in gold and precious metals. One diplomat said that lifting an embargo on imports of Iranian petrochemical products to Europe, if Iran responded, was also on the table. But a US official said the world powers had not offered to suspend oil or financial sanctions.

Still, asked about the prospects for an agreement, Iran’s Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said he was “very confident.”

Despite years of war-whooping and crisis-mongering on Iran, it’s beginning to sink in that Iran’s nuclear program doesn’t represent much of a threat. In fact, Iran has been taking steps on the ground to reassure the most hawkish observers, including Israel, that a bomb isn’t imminent. As the Times reported yesterday, in a passage notably less alarmist than is often the case:

At the same time, Iran has taken some of its stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium and converted it into reactor fuel, which cannot easily be turned back. The conversion means that Iran now has less of the uranium needed to make a bomb, reducing the sense of urgency among the six powers, and Israel, that its nuclear program needs to be slowed.

But the total Iranian stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium has nonetheless grown since November to 167 kilograms from 135 kilograms, according to the most recent I.A.E.A. report—closer to, if still significantly below, the 240 kilograms or 250 kilograms many experts consider necessary, once enriched further, to produce a nuclear weapon.

In other words, the stuff that Iran has is really hard to convert into bomb material, and anyway it doesn’t have enough of it.

Robert Dreyfuss recently returned from a trip to Tanzania, where he looked at the successes and limitations of foreign aid.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x