Obama Slaps Down Petraeus on Invading Pakistan

Obama Slaps Down Petraeus on Invading Pakistan

Obama Slaps Down Petraeus on Invading Pakistan

The military has floated plans to send Special Forces across the Afghan border into Pakistan’s tribal areas. Not gonna happen.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Not long ago, I reported here on one the worst trial balloons ever floated during the Obama administration, namely, the idea of sending US military forces across the border from Afghanistan into Pakistan in pursuit of the Taliban and its allies. When the idea, first reported by the New York Times, surfaced, it was clear that the military was pushing for it, and at the time I compared it to President Nixon’s decision to expand the Vietnam War into Cambodia.

Now, it appears that the administration has decided against that, although the military commanders in the field are still hot to trot into the wilds of Waziristan and environs.

According to the Washington Post’s Karen de Young, "President Obama and his top national security aides rejected proposals, made by some military commanders and intelligence officials who have lost patience with Pakistan, to allow US ground forces to conduct targeted raids against insurgent safe havens, officials said. They concluded that the United States can ill afford to threaten or further alienate a precarious, nuclear-armed country whose cooperation is essential to the administration on several fronts."

That’s exactly right: it would seriously destabilize that unfortunate country, already plagued by Islamist militants of various kinds, including ones like the fanatic who assassinated the secular governor of Punjab this week.

Another good sign, reports de Young—though we’ll see—is that "the administration also plans ‘redouble our efforts to look for political approaches’ to ending the war, including a recognition that Pakistan ‘must play an important role’ if not a dominant one, in reconciliation talks with the Taliban."

For Petraeus, for the military, and for the neoconservatives demanding all-out war, both of these decisions are defeats.

It isn’t clear what else will be included in the "new" US policy toward Pakistan, though de Young reports that when Vice President Biden visits Pakistan next week he’ll bring stepped up pledges by the United States of "military, intelligence and economic support." Personally, I’m in favor of bribing Pakistan with whatever it takes to coax them and their Taliban cats-paws to the bargaining table.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x