Where in the World Is Daryl Morey?

Where in the World Is Daryl Morey?

The Houston Rockets GM dipped his toe into political waters, and now the players are left to clean up the mess.


Where is Daryl Morey? The Houston Rockets general manager launched an international incident of Shaq-size proportions when he tweeted—and then swiftly deleted—support for the protesters of Hong Kong last week.

China does billions of dollars in business with the NBA and is home to hundreds of millions of league fans. The Chinese government, of course, was not amused with Morey’s keyboard activism. It terminated several lucrative contracts with the league and canceled the television broadcast of an exhibition game in Shanghai between LeBron’s LA Lakers and the Brooklyn Nets. Despite the fulsome apologies offered by the league, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver affirmed Morey’s right to free speech and to have an opinion about the people of Hong Kong taking to the streets—and the Chinese government continued to be enraged.

Since Morey’s tweet, there have been two bizarre developments in this global drama. The first is that the media has been obsessed with getting a juicy response on the escalation of tensions between the league and China, but outlets haven’t been beating down the door of the person who sparked all of this, Morey. Instead, they are going to coaches Steve Kerr and Gregg Popovich and to players who have been vocal in recent years on questions of police brutality, racism, and the various pathologies of Donald Trump.

Part of the press’s desire to hear from this particular segment of the NBA world has been exacerbated by our lizard-brained president, who has used this as an opportunity to attack the players and coaches that have criticized him. But it still is bizarre that the political weight of this has been put on the shoulders of people who said nothing about China but just so happen to be the most outspoken players on anti-black racism and Trump. In contrast, no pressure has been applied to NBA owners to issue their own thoughts about China’s authoritarian practices, and certainly no pressure has been placed on the normally milquetoast Morey. The Houston GM has been allowed to slink into hiding while this issue of the NBA’s business practice is being used to attack and discredit the players who have already dared stand up. They—and they alone—are being criticized for not standing forthrightly enough with the people of Hong Kong. This is not a coincidence. What we are seeing is the media using the China kerfuffle to perpetuate a backlash and to silence the outspoken. It’s a clampdown.

The other development that demands attention is the little-reported news that, according to Yahoo Sports, “at least five” NBA teams are preparing for a lowering of the salary cap—what each team may spend on players—by as much as 10 to 15 percent, based on lost revenue as a result of the China fallout. That would mean as much as $17 million less that each team could spend on player salaries.

It’s outrageous that because of one NBA manager’s Twitter support for the protesters of Hong Kong, the players could be making significantly less money. The players will bear the brunt of a member of management’s very fungible courage. It would be one thing if the league as a whole, in conjunction with the players, took a stand on the question of China and were willing to let the financial chips fall where they may. (Clearly, neither the league nor the union is prepared to do that.) But it’s quite another for management to pass the pain on to the players for its own foibles. The players’ union, the National Basketball Players Association, and its executive director, Michele Roberts, should make it plain and clear that Morey’s foray into politics should not end up on the player’s tab. The NBA’s situation with China—the business relationship, the historic ignoring of human rights abuses, and the hope no one would notice—is a mess of the franchise owners’ making. Now that the chickens are coming home to roost, they should be the ones to pay.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy