Maine Backs Corporate and Presidential Accountability

Maine Backs Corporate and Presidential Accountability

Maine Backs Corporate and Presidential Accountability

Former Common Cause president Chellie Pingree, a passionate reformer who calls for a rapid end to the war in Iraq and supports the opening of impeachment hearings against President Bush, easily won Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Maine’s 1st congressional district.

The Democratic-leaning seat came open when incumbent Tom Allen decided to challenge Republican Senator Susan Collins this fall.

Pingree faced a free-spending challenge from a former Republican, Adam Cote, who switched parties to mount a campaign that was backed by business groups that were engaged in bluewashing — the tactic of pouring money into a Democratic primary in a blue state or district with hopes of nominating the candidate most inclined to favor corporate interests.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Former Common Cause president Chellie Pingree, a passionate reformer who calls for a rapid end to the war in Iraq and supports the opening of impeachment hearings against President Bush, easily won Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Maine’s 1st congressional district.

The Democratic-leaning seat came open when incumbent Tom Allen decided to challenge Republican Senator Susan Collins this fall.

Pingree faced a free-spending challenge from a former Republican, Adam Cote, who switched parties to mount a campaign that was backed by business groups that were engaged in bluewashing — the tactic of pouring money into a Democratic primary in a blue state or district with hopes of nominating the candidate most inclined to favor corporate interests.

Cote hoped to capitalize on the fact that the progressive vote in the Portland-area district would be divided between Pingree and several other anti-war Democrats, including state Rep. Ethan Strimling and prosecutor Mark Lawrence.

And he aggressively attacked Pingree, a former Maine state senator who was considered the front-runner, for backing presidential accountability. “Cote Will Focus On Economy, Pingree On Impeachment,” read a press release from Cote’s campaign, in which the candidate said of Pingree’s support for impeachment and Cote opposition to it: “This is a defining, substantive issue difference in this election.”

The attack was absurd. Pingree was never cautious about stating her support for holding President Bush and Vice President Cheney to account. But impeachment was not the central issue of her campaign. Despite what Cote and his corporate backers claimed, it was Pingree who made the economy a prime focus of her campaign. She has long been a leading advocate of health care reform, in Maine and nationally. And she’s an enthusiastic backer of new, progressive approaches on trade policy, energy policy and other concerns of working families.

Still, Cote’s campaign made impeachment an issue.

And if Cote wants to describe impeachment as the “defining” issue, well, fair enough.

Pingree is going to be the Democratic nominee. She was way ahead Tuesday night with 44 percent of the vote to 26 percent for Cote. And two other candidates who strongly backed impeachment, Strimling and Lawrence, were grabbing another 16 percent of the vote.

So presidential accountability proved to be a winning issue Tuesday. And corporate bluewashing suffered a serious setback.

An urgent message from the Editors

As the editors of The Nation, it’s not usually our role to fundraise. Today, however, we’re putting out a special appeal to our readers, because there are only hours left in 2025 and we’re still $20,000 away from our goal of $75,000. We need you to help close this gap. 

Your gift to The Nation directly supports the rigorous, confrontational, and truly independent journalism that our country desperately needs in these dark times.

2025 was a terrible year for press freedom in the United States. Trump launched personal attack after personal attack against journalists, newspapers, and broadcasters across the country, including multiple billion-dollar lawsuits. The White House even created a government website to name and shame outlets that report on the administration with anti-Trump bias—an exercise in pure intimidation.

The Nation will never give in to these threats and will never be silenced. In fact, we’re ramping up for a year of even more urgent and powerful dissent. 

With the 2026 elections on the horizon, and knowing Trump’s history of false claims of fraud when he loses, we’re going to be working overtime with writers like Elie Mystal, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Jeet Heer, Kali Holloway, Katha Pollitt, and Chris Lehmann to cut through the right’s spin, lies, and cover-ups as the year develops.

If you donate before midnight, your gift will be matched dollar for dollar by a generous donor. We hope you’ll make our work possible with a donation. Please, don’t wait any longer.

In solidarity,

The Nation Editors

Ad Policy
x