Katrina vanden Heuvel: CBS’s Egregious Double Standard

Katrina vanden Heuvel: CBS’s Egregious Double Standard

Katrina vanden Heuvel: CBS’s Egregious Double Standard

What Laura Logan's apology means.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Lara Logan's CBS 60 Minutes apology doesn't quite cut the mustard. That’s what Nation editor and publisher Katrina vanden Heuvel said when she went on MSNBC’s The Ed Show to discuss revelations that 60 Minutes had an imposter on its show discussing the Benghazi raid last year that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.

Speaking on a panel with Media Matters’ Eric Boehlart, she asked whether CBS’s ownership of the Simon & Schuster imprint that published the imposter’s story had influenced their decision to put him on air. She said the new world of media had various corporate interests to contend with. “These companies are not just news organizations, they have vast operations and this imprint is a measure of corporate self-interest,” she said.

vanden Heuvel also noted similarities to the scandal that led to Dan Rather’s resignation from 60 Minutes after a 2004 broadcast that questioned former President George W. Bush’s military service record. In that case, Republican media furore pressured CBS into an independent investigation.

“We saw a pathetically inadequate apology the other evening and we're witnessing an egregious double standard in terms of handling this,” vanden Heuvel said. “We need an independent investigation because, let's face it, the media's on trial here too.”

“Do we need a lapdog media in this country or do we need a watchdog?” She asked, “Put aside left and right, this is about the integrity of the media.”

—Nicolas Niarchos

More Katrina vanden Heuvel here: How Progressives in the Democratic Party are gaining steam.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x