July 30, 1965: LBJ Signs Medicare Into Law

July 30, 1965: LBJ Signs Medicare Into Law

July 30, 1965: LBJ Signs Medicare Into Law

Was it really a “sweeping new departure in American social legislation”?


“Medicare for all” has become the rallying cry in recent years of those who argue for a single-payer universal public health-insurance system. The Nation was on to this point early on, even before Medicare was signed into law, 50 years ago today. When the bill that created Medicare passed the House of Representatives in April 1965, The Nation’s Stanley Meisler wrote that it wasn’t as direct an intervention in the country’s economy as it could or should have been, or as its critics thought it was.

Medicare will be “the most sweeping new departure in American social legislation since Roosevelt’s Social Security Act 30 years ago.” That description, culled from one of the many news accounts of House passage of the bill, already has deadened into a cliché. All analysts have accepted the fact of Medicare’s great impact, but very few have bothered to delve into the details of that impact. How will America and medicine change after Medicare? Medicare may have its most profound impact on American society if its pressures lead to the day when the federal government uses general revenues to pay for more pensions and health insurance than it does now. Financing these through social security alone follows the principle that every man has the right to help himself. Financing these through general revenues as well recognizes that self-help alone cannot do an adequate job and that every man has the right to expect his government to help him to a pension and health insurance. That, in fact, would be a “sweeping new departure in American social legislation.”

July 30, 1965

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy