Jeremy Scahill and Peter Beinart on WikiLeaks: Policy Porn, or Public Service?

Jeremy Scahill and Peter Beinart on WikiLeaks: Policy Porn, or Public Service?

Jeremy Scahill and Peter Beinart on WikiLeaks: Policy Porn, or Public Service?

WIth the latest diplomatic cables dump from WikiLeaks sending waves throughout the political and media worlds, the organization’s activities are raising questions such as, is releasing all this information gratuitous, even irresponsible? Or is it a valuable public service?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

WIth the latest diplomatic cables dump from WikiLeaks sending waves throughout the political and media worlds, the organization’s activities are raising questions such as, is releasing all this information gratuitous, even irresponsible? Is it just a bunch of policy porn? Or is it a valuable public service?

The Nation‘s Jeremy Scahill went on the Joy Behar Show Monday to debate the issue with Peter Beinart, senior political writer at The Daily Beast. Scahill argues that the main thing to remember is that these leaks shed light on important issues: diplomats spying on other diplomats, US attacks on Yemen and more.

But do we really need to know about Putin and Berlusconi’s bromance? And do the rest of the cables include information that might do more harm than good? Would we have gone to war in Iraq in the first place if WikiLeaks had been around? Watch the clip to hear Scahill and Beinart weigh in.

Jeremy Scahill is a Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute and author of the book Blackwater. You can read his articles here.

Braden Goyette

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x