January 20, 1937: FDR Is Inaugurated for the Second Time

January 20, 1937: FDR Is Inaugurated for the Second Time

January 20, 1937: FDR Is Inaugurated for the Second Time

“A thin but pleasant sort of rhetoric” suffused FDR’s second inaugural address, The Nation thought.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This was the first time a presidential inauguration took place on January 20, rather than March 4, as initially prescribed in the Constitution. The adjustment was provided for in the Twentieth Amendment, proposed in early 1932 and ratified in January 1933. The first president to be newly inaugurated as president on January 20—rather than for a second, third or fourth term, as for Roosevelt, or to begin a new term after having completed his predecessor’s, as for Truman—was Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 20, 1953. In an editorial note in the issue of January 30, 1937, The Nation reviewed FDR’s second inaugural address.

We doubt that the inaugural address will go down in history as a great state paper. Neither in its literary quality nor in the tenor of its program did it carry conviction. There was a thin but pleasant sort of rhetoric about it, and it was drenched in a moral good-will, but it failed to recapture the ringing faith, the clear call to action, and the decisiveness of the first inaugural address. Either Mr. Roosevelt must have some sort of reluctancy to bring out his best powers, or else we have grown immune to his generalities during the last four years. Yet the address might have been far worse. It might have struck the “era of good feeling” note, or the complacent note of America’s return to the pre-1929 Golden Age. That would probably have been Mr. Langdon’s inaugural, had he been given a chance at one. Instead, Mr. Roosevelt dedicated himself to reaching the “happy valley” of permanently improved living standards under democratic procedures. His address was distinctive as a picture, drawn for the first time by an American President, of poverty under capitalism. But the President did not make clear, even in general terms, how he would reach the happy valley. Is it to be by a steady and gradual march to a firm control over industry? Or is it to be by dotting the i‘s and crossing the t’s of the old New Deal?

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x