Greg Mitchell and Daniel Ellsberg on the WikiLeaks Document Dump

Greg Mitchell and Daniel Ellsberg on the WikiLeaks Document Dump

Greg Mitchell and Daniel Ellsberg on the WikiLeaks Document Dump

The morning after WikiLeaks began releasing its trove of confidential US diplomatic cables, Democracy Now! hosts a roundtable about the possible impact of these leaks.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Yesterday, the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks began releasing their giant trove of confidential US diplomatic cables. This morning, Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman summarizes some of these documents’ revelations, which include evidence of Arab leaders urging the US to attack Iran, the US using its embassies as part of a global spy network and the US asking diplomats to gather intelligence.

In a Democracy Now! round-table discussion with Pentagon Papers whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg, The Nation’s Greg Mitchell, who has been blogging about WikiLeaks on Media Fix, Carne Ross, a British diplomat who resigned before the Iraq War, and As’ad AbuKhalil, a professor of political science at California State University, Ellsberg says that "it is too early to judge the values and dangers" of the new WikiLeaks documents, but he reminds viewers that "not one single soldier or informant has been in danger from any of the WikiLeaks releases…. That risk has been largely overblown."

Greg Mitchell agrees that it is too early to assess the WikiLeaks documents, but he compares the new batch of WikiLeaks documents with the previous releases from July and October of this year. Mitchell says that while the earlier documents garnered "one-day stories," media coverage about the new WikiLeaks information "will be emerging over the next nine days in the New York Times for example, and WikiLeaks has said on their own site that it will be going on for months."

Stay tuned for more breaking news coverage of the WikiLeaks releases from Greg Mitchell on Media Fix.

—Joanna Chiu

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x