Governor Christie Goes to War on Working Families

Governor Christie Goes to War on Working Families

Governor Christie Goes to War on Working Families

The Reverend Al Sharpton and education and labor leaders will participate in protests today opposing the governor’s treatment of working families.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Reverend Al Sharpton will join national union leaders in scheduled rallies today across New Jersey to draw attention to hardships facing working families. The adversities in question include budget cuts that squeeze the middle-class, according to labor leaders.

The American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten and Lee Saunders, the international secretary-treasurer of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, will join Sharpton.

The trio plan on leading a morning rally to protest the closing of a psychiatric facility in Vineland, followed by a panel discussion with state lawmakers at noon, culminating with an evening rally in Newark.

Governor Christie has proposed a 7 to 11 percent cut in the state’s general assistance program, while simultaneously vetoing 2010 legislation that would have temporarily raised taxes on those in the top income brackets. Overall, Christie slashed $820 million in state aid last year and $1 billion from school funding.

Christie is now being sued by the Education Law Center, which says the cuts violate the funding requirement set by courts. The governor’s education cuts were so deep they left New Jersey schools unable to provide “thorough and efficient” education to the state’s 1.4 million school children, according to a Superior Court judge.

The case is now being heard by the state Supreme Court, but Christie apparently believes the court’s ruling will be an adorable suggestion rather than official decree. During the “Ask the Governor” radio program on New Jersey 101.5, Christie said ignoring the Supreme Court ruling was “an option.”

During the hearing, Associate Supreme Court Justice Barry Albin asked twice about Christie’s decision not to renew a “millionaires tax” to raise revenue, according to NJ.com. Christie criticized this line of questioning, saying Albin was advocating to “put his hand in the pockets of the taxpayer of New Jersey, take money and determine himself how it should be spent.”

It was last year when Christie took a record two minutes to veto the extension of the millionaires tax certified by the state Senate. The move raised taxes on senior citizens while cutting them for the rich.

Christie and other conservatives argued that such a tax would stifle job growth and cause rich people to flee the state. Yet, that threat never manifested in reality after the tax’s implementation in 2004. A study by sociologists Cristobal Young at Stanford and Charles Varner at Princeton found the millionaire population actually grew over the period of the study, even through the recession.

The study found that the overall population of millionaires increased during the tax period. Some millionaires moved out, of course. But they were more than offset by the creation of new millionaires.

They found that the rate of out-migration among millionaires was in line with and [sic] rate of out-migration of submillionaires. The tax rate, they concluded, had no measurable impact.

This suggests that the policy effect is close to zero,” the study says.

The assault on education is but one of many complaints working families have against the governor. There’s also his attack of collective bargaining rights, women’s health care and issues of fair taxation.

Christie has made no secret of his intent to go to war on unions. One of his first acts in office last year was signing an executive order banning state worker unions from making political donations over $300 per campaign. Ultimately, an appeals court blocked that order from taking effect.

According to NJ.com, Christie mockingly says he “loves” collective bargaining, and yet he refuses to negotiate health or pension benefit reforms, and instead looks to reduce those programs through legislation.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x