Gloves Off at Invesco

Gloves Off at Invesco

 Barack Obama took audacity to new heights tonight and if thecrowd’s reaction to his acceptance speech at Mile High Stadium is any indicator–he knocked it out of the park, touchdown, homerun and every other tired sports metaphor thisblogger can’t think of. What impressed me most is the sheer chutzpah ofthe moment–the daring of attempting to fill a football stadium (done),the daunting logistical challenge of coordinating the event (ding), theintelligence and grassroots organizing that went into the programming(yeah, they did) and, above all, how much rhetorical work Obama pulledoff in a speech that had the highest of expectations.

 

 

 

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

 Barack Obama took audacity to new heights tonight and if thecrowd’s reaction to his acceptance speech at Mile High Stadium is any indicator–he knocked it out of the park, touchdown, homerun and every other tired sports metaphor thisblogger can’t think of. What impressed me most is the sheer chutzpah ofthe moment–the daring of attempting to fill a football stadium (done),the daunting logistical challenge of coordinating the event (ding), theintelligence and grassroots organizing that went into the programming(yeah, they did) and, above all, how much rhetorical work Obama pulledoff in a speech that had the highest of expectations.

He hit hard on John McCain, tougher than was expected, inverting the normalconvention convention whereby surrogates attack the rival candidate butthe nominee is all sweetness-and-light. Pointing out that McCain voted90 percent of the time with Bush, Obama said, "I don’t know about you,but I’m not ready to take a ten percent chance on change," to thunderousand sustained applause. From the economy to the war–Obama linked McCain to the Bush administration’s record, and he was helped, perhaps crucially,by six citizens who testified to their very ordinary, very movingordeals–including an autoworker, a teacher, a nurse, a pet store ownerand a guy named Barney Smith, who gave the most memorable line of thenight when he said, in the most adorable dorky way, "We need a Presidentwho fights for Barney Smith, not Smith Barney!"

If, to my mind, there were some political sour notes, especially thesuggestion that Iraq was enjoying a surplus while Americans suffered adeficit, the sheer constraints on a Barack Obama candidacy were alsorevealed–the burden of proving one’s patriotism, discrediting ignoblesmears against one’s faith (not that there’s anything wrong with being aMuslim) and countering the McCain talking point that politicalpopularity is the equivalent of cult worship. Perhaps, because of theseburdens–many unique to Obama, most unfair–some of the necessary,crucial themes seemed, to this blogger, buried too deep within. Theeconomic crisis that most Americans struggle with was movinglyhighlighted, but the solutions–or even the chief culprits–remainedvague. The foreign policy dilemmas remained too wrapped in the languageof American exceptionalism. The culture war was assuaged, but only withsignificant cheats–the idea, for example, that gun control is about"keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals" or that same-sex marriagewas about visiting one’s loved one in the hospital.

It’s impossible to address–to the satisfaction of the left AND theelectorate–all of these issues in one speech, but this one, this greatone came close–closer than we Americans have any right to expect,perhaps, more than we deserve. 

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x