France Tries to Diversify Higher Education

France Tries to Diversify Higher Education

France Tries to Diversify Higher Education

The US and French systems are vastly differrent, but if we’re any example, the French have got their work cut out for them.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Complicated efforts at diversifying campuses and reprioritizing college entrance criteria have ignited debates on higher education in America for years. But in France, as the New York Times recently reported, these cans of worms are just now being popped open as President Nicolas Sarkozy’s government is urging its most elite schools to raise the percentage of students on scholarships.

Essentially, the French are just beginning to consider the notion that a higher education system that rewards and retains a privileged elite is not ideal. But give them credit for taking the problem head on now that it’s been identified.

The New York Times reports that France’s "grandes ecoles" — about 220 elite universities into which entry is virtually a guarantee of lifelong success — are being pressured to increase the proportion of students accepted on scholarships to at least 30 percent, at the risk of losing funding. Stubborn higher education authorities are afraid that standards will dip and that the scholarship students won’t be equipped to handle the rigorous academics once enrolled. The Times calls the French higher education system self-satisfied; The Independent refers to it as a "reluctant establishment."

If the grandes ecoles function the way the Ivy League does, and have far more qualified applicants than spots for enrollment, the fear of declining educational standards is a moot point — especially because every student, on scholarship or not, has to pass an incredibly competitive entrance exam. The bigger issue, and the point where France and America unavoidably part in addressing the issue, is that France cannot implement American-style affirmative action in the hopes of improving racial diversity at the grandes ecoles (which are publicly funded, unlike elite American universities) because, well … the country doesn’t classify its citizens racially and thus collects no statistics on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity. The only channel through which to promote diversity of all kinds, then, is on the basis of class, a category that many in the US still pretend doesn’t actually exist.

In years of chasing our tails and attempting to perform a  near-impossible balancing act, America has seen how messy the diversification debate can become and how difficult it can be to achieve mass-based, race and class-exclusive higher education. Our systems are vastly differrent, but if we’re any example, the French have got their work cut out for them.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x