The Final Battle: Lessig vs. Greenwald

The Final Battle: Lessig vs. Greenwald

The Final Battle: Lessig vs. Greenwald

Lawrence Lessig and Glenn Greenwald debate Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court has resulted in heated debate among progressives and liberals. One such debate pits Salon.com columnist Glenn Greenwald against Harvard law professor and Nation contributor Lawrence Lessig, who both appeared on Monday’s Rachel Maddow Show.

On the show Greenwald made his case against Kagan’s nomination, and Lessig, who came on after Greenwald, called Greenwald’s views “absurd.” Greenwald didn’t get a chance for rebuttal on the show, so he did so on his Salon blog, which prompted a response from Lessig on The Huffington Post. Democracy Now! invited both Lessig and Greenwald onto the show to debate their positions at the same time.

—Morgan Ashenfelter

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x