In Fact…

In Fact…

THE NSA NONHEARINGS

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

THE NSA NONHEARINGS

Bruce Shapiro writes: Washington has never seen a noninvestigation quite like the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing into the NSA surveillance scandal: On the one hand, Attorney General Gonzales’s cheerful defiance of any probing question; on the other hand, the Republican committee leadership falling over one another to avoid calling Gonzales to account. Senator Arlen Specter, once a proudly independent civil libertarian (and who has made dissenting noises over the NSA program), gave the Attorney General a free pass by refusing Senator Russ Feingold’s request to take his testimony under oath. Then Specter punted Congressional responsibility for the whole matter by proposing that the secret FISA court rule on the entire program, radically expanding its purview from individual warrants to national security policy. It was not the toothless Judiciary Committee but Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee who finally managed to alarm the White House enough to get a full committee briefing on the surveillance operation. The new White House strategy relies on letting Republicans and Democrats alike vent about being excluded from briefings, as a distraction from the core issue: the surveillance program. Democrats, with a few notable exceptions like Feingold, are slouching to the occasion, complaining about the President’s abuse of authority but not challenging domestic spying itself.

WEAPONS OF MISDIRECTION

Shapiro also writes: Last November 13, two close friends went hunting in northern Vermont late on a Sunday afternoon. Jason Bean, 22 years old, heard a sound he thought was a deer; he fired his rifle. The bullet struck his 23-year-old buddy Chad Lumbra in the hip. In short, it was a hunting accident–similar in many respects to the accidental shooting of lawyer Harry Whittington by Vice President Cheney on February 11. Here’s the difference. Unlike Harry Whittington, who suffered a minor heart attack, Chad Lumbra died of blood loss. And unlike Vice President Cheney, Jason Bean has been charged with manslaughter. Hunting accidents happen–but when they do, police investigations are often rigorous, because in certain circumstances an accidental shooting suggests reckless endangerment. Twenty-four hours of White House silence after the Vice President shot a man in the face raise real questions: Was Cheney in any way compromised in his judgment? The accident happened in late afternoon: What about his admitted lunchtime drinking? Do any of his health problems or the medications he takes affect his reflexes? Did the twelve hours before Cheney was interviewed by a local sheriff’s deputy, and the nearly full day before a calculated Corpus Christi press leak, buy time to line up participants’ stories? All of this would amount to speculation relevant only to the idle paranoid–except that for Cheney the political and the personal really are indistinguishable. A war in Iraq, a hunting accident in Texas; evading accountability and suppressing the news are this Vice President’s signature.

MOVE OVER, BROWNIE

Two months after Jeremy Scahill’s exposé of Stewart Simonson, George W. Bush’s official in charge of preparing the nation for bioterror attacks, avian flu and other public health emergencies (“Germ Boys and Yes Men,” Nov. 28, 2005), requests are mounting for the removal of the man who’s on track to be the next Michael Brown. “This is a serious job at this point, and I think we need to have professionals filling it, not political appointees,” Republican Tom Davis, who chairs the committee overseeing Simonson’s Project Bioshield, told CBS’s 60 Minutes, which aired a lengthy report on Simonson last month. “To date he’s been singularly unimpressive.”

THIS WEEK ON THE WEB

NASA climatologist James Hansen, whom Bush apparatchiks tried to muzzle, tells Bryan Farrell how we can still mitigate global warming. And Nicholas von Hoffman explores a trend among the super-rich to freeze themselves and their bank accounts in hopes of rising again.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x