‘Django Unchained’: Quentin Tarantino’s Answer to Spielberg’s ‘Lincoln’

‘Django Unchained’: Quentin Tarantino’s Answer to Spielberg’s ‘Lincoln’

‘Django Unchained’: Quentin Tarantino’s Answer to Spielberg’s ‘Lincoln’

In one film, grateful black people; in the other, the vengeful ones.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Two films about American slavery in the Civil War era are currently playing in theaters.

Steven Spielberg’s film Lincoln begins with a black soldier reciting the Gettysburg Address.

Quentin Tarantino’s film Django Unchained begins with a black slave being recruited to kill three white murderers.

In Spielberg’s film, the leading black female character is a humble seamstress in the White House whose eyes fill with tears of gratitude when Congress votes to abolish slavery.

In Tarantino’s film, the leading black female character (Kerry Washington) is a defiant slave who has been branded on the face as a punishment for running away, and is forced—by Leonardo DiCaprio—to work as a prostitute.

In Spielberg’s film, all the black people are good.

Tarantino’s film features “the biggest, nastiest ‘Uncle Tom’ ever”—played by Samuel Jackson—who is insanely loyal to his evil white master, and savage in his treatment of fellow slaves.

In Spielberg’s film, old white men make history, and black people thank them for giving them their freedom.

In Tarantino’s, a black gunslinger goes after the white slavemaster with homicidal vengeance.

In Spielberg’s film, Daniel Day-Lewis is magnficent as Lincoln.

In Tarantino’s, Jamie Foxx is magnificent as Django.

Spielberg says the history in Lincoln is true. Tarantino says the history in Django Unchained is “very right on. In fact, if anything, I’m actually holding back somewhat from some of the more extreme stuff.”

Spielberg’s film displays the director’s “integrity and seriousness of purpose.” (Hendrik Hertzberg, The New Yorker)

Tarantino’s displays the director’s “signature rococo verbal theatrics, outlandish humor and flair for both embracing and subverting genre conventions.” (Christopher Wallenberg, Boston Globe)

Spielberg’s film is “a stirring reminder that politics can be noble.” (Chris Vognar, Dallas Morning News)

Tarantino’s is “unwholesome, deplorable and delicious” (Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian), but never lets us forget the brutal reality of slavery.

Did Lincoln free the slaves, or did slaves fight to free themselves? Check out Jon Wiener on the historical problems with Spielberg's Lincoln

Time is running out to have your gift matched 

In this time of unrelenting, often unprecedented cruelty and lawlessness, I’m grateful for Nation readers like you. 

So many of you have taken to the streets, organized in your neighborhood and with your union, and showed up at the ballot box to vote for progressive candidates. You’re proving that it is possible—to paraphrase the legendary Patti Smith—to redeem the work of the fools running our government.

And as we head into 2026, I promise that The Nation will fight like never before for justice, humanity, and dignity in these United States. 

At a time when most news organizations are either cutting budgets or cozying up to Trump by bringing in right-wing propagandists, The Nation’s writers, editors, copy editors, fact-checkers, and illustrators confront head-on the administration’s deadly abuses of power, blatant corruption, and deconstruction of both government and civil society. 

We couldn’t do this crucial work without you.

Through the end of the year, a generous donor is matching all donations to The Nation’s independent journalism up to $75,000. But the end of the year is now only days away. 

Time is running out to have your gift doubled. Don’t wait—donate now to ensure that our newsroom has the full $150,000 to start the new year. 

Another world really is possible. Together, we can and will win it!

Love and Solidarity,

John Nichols 

Executive Editor, The Nation

Ad Policy
x