Did Chris Christie Use Sandy Relief Money for Political Gain?

Did Chris Christie Use Sandy Relief Money for Political Gain?

Did Chris Christie Use Sandy Relief Money for Political Gain?

Less than a week after the “Bridgegate” scandal exploded, federal officials are now probing Chris Christie’s use of funds allocated for Sandy relief.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As Chris Christie continues to face questions over the “Bridgegate” scandal, federal officials are probing the New Jersey Governor’s use of Superstorm Sandy relief funds, CNN reports.

Specifically, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development is looking into $4.7 million spent by the state on a tourism video featuring Christie and his family during a gubernatorial election year. Last August, the Asbury Park Press revealed a runner-up bid to produce the campaign, not starring Christie, would have cost $2.2 million less. The public relations firm hired by the state of New Jersey to make the ads, MWW, has ties to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

The campaign, titled “Stronger Than the Storm,” was part of a $25 million state tourism package allocated by Congress’ as part of Sandy relief. Last August, Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) raised concerns in a letter to HUD Inspector General David A. Montoya, questioning “whether Governor Christie took advantage of the federal funds for his personal political gain.”

HUD’s investigation is the second big hit to Christie’s administration in less than a week. The governor fired two high-level staffers last Thursday after the release of hundreds of e-mails and text messages implicated them in the politically-motivated closure of a George Washington Bridge lane last September.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x