Despite Concerns, Young Voters Tuned In and Turned Out in 2012

Despite Concerns, Young Voters Tuned In and Turned Out in 2012

Despite Concerns, Young Voters Tuned In and Turned Out in 2012

Without the youth vote, Obama woud have lost Florida, Ohio, Virginia and Pennsylvania—and the election.


(AP Photo/J Pat Carter)

Add this to the list of bad bets the GOP placed this year: that young Americans’ support for Barack Obama, and their interest in politics in general, was tenuous enough to break—and that it could be broken through discouragement and voter suppression, rather than by specific appeals to their concerns.

Twenty-two to 23 million Americans under 30 voted yesterday, with a turnout rate of at least 49 percent among eligible voters. That figure is comparable with the estimate at this time in 2008, which later rose to 52 percent as final results trickled in. Nearly a fifth of all voters were under 30 (19 percent, up from 18 percent in 2008), and they voted for Obama by a twenty-three-point margin, 60 to 37 percent.

The president could not have won without them. An analysis from the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) suggests that eighty of Obama’s electoral votes depended on the support of young voters. If Romney had captured just half of the youth vote in Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania and Florida, those states would have swung red, and those eighty votes would have given Romney the presidency.

“I was pretty much prepared to sound some kind of alarm,” CIRCLE’s Peter Levine said this morning, referring to projections that youth participation would drop off precipitously in this election. While 2008 was designated as the ‘year of the youth vote,’ the showing from millennials this year is even more striking given the hurdles young voters had to overcome. Confusion spread by voter ID laws, hours-long waits at the polls, a presidential fight waged in a fraction of the states and shadowed by dark money, and the long slog of the economic recovery, all could have kept young voters from the polls. “They had a choice,” said Rock the Vote’s president Heather Smith, “to opt out because of frustration. But they understood that people trump money.”

And millennials didn’t just show up to vote for the president. In California, decidedly not in play as a swing state, young voters made up 27 percent of the electorate. Elizabeth Warren won her senate seat with the support of over 60 percent of young voters in Massachusetts. Ballot initiatives legalizing gay marriage passed in Maryland, Maine and Washington.

“This voting block can no longer be an afterthought to any political party or campaign,” said Smith, calling strong youth participation ‘the new normal” in American politics. Since 2004, about half of all young adults have voted in presidential elections, while through the 1990s turnout hovered near 40 percent.

By 2020, millennials will account for nearly 40 percent of the electorate. They are more diverse than any previous generation, and the single moniker belies the span of their political concerns. These voters are also coming of age in a time when support for gay marriage is not radical but a matter of basic fairness; when a black president is elected not once but twice; and when strong women win the battles for seats in Congress. It wasn’t just that the president had a stronger ground game, four years of pro-youth policy and an emotional foundation to run on. It’s that Republicans across the board support policies that most young Americans do not.

As I reported last month, the hand-wringing over generational apathy was in part a misreading of criticism from young citizens who will be pushing for a more progressive second term from Obama. Today, it’s their votes that matter. But tomorrow, and for years to come, their criticism may prove more valuable. These young voters are the “stubborn thing[s]” the president invoked early this morning in his acceptance speech, who insist “despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us.”

Ad Policy