Democrats Win Another GOP House Seat

Democrats Win Another GOP House Seat

Democrats took another Republican-held U.S. House seat in a special election Saturday, suggesting that the party remains on track for significant expansion of its congressional majorities in 2008.

Louisiana Democrat Don Cazayoux, a young moderate with state legislative experience, snatched a seat that Republicans had held since the 1970s by a 49-46 margin over a well-funded campaign by veteran Republican legislator Woody Jenkins.

The win extends the Democratic majority in the House to 235-198 and it continues a pattern of special-election wins for the party in seats that have traditionally been thought of as Republican strongholds — including the Illinois turf of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Democrats took another Republican-held U.S. House seat in a special election Saturday, suggesting that the party remains on track for significant expansion of its congressional majorities in 2008.

Louisiana Democrat Don Cazayoux, a young moderate with state legislative experience, snatched a seat that Republicans had held since the 1970s by a 49-46 margin over a well-funded campaign by veteran Republican legislator Woody Jenkins.

The win extends the Democratic majority in the House to 235-198 and it continues a pattern of special-election wins for the party in seats that have traditionally been thought of as Republican strongholds — including the Illinois turf of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

But it does something far more significant.

Republicans and their allied special-interest groups had sought to save the seat by “nationalizing” — or, to be more precise, racializing — the contest with a campaign that sought to tie Cazayoux to Democratic presidential frontrunner Barack Obama. Hoping to capitalize on concerns about Obama’s former minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, in order to exploit racial divisions in the south and other regions of recent Republican strength, GOP operatives have developed advertising schemes that feature images of Obama, Wright and local Democratic candidates.

The strategy was implemented in Louisiana and is also being used in an upcoming Mississippi special election.

The Louisiana results had Maryland Congressman Chris Van Hollen, the able chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, declaring, “Republicans were reminded that ‘all politics is local.’ House Republicans tried to nationalize this election, illegally coordinated with Freedom’s Watch, used false and deceptive special interest smears, and funneled nearly a million dollars into a district that Republicans held for more than three decades.”

But don’t expect the Republicans, who have struggled to come up with a plan to divert voter attention from economic and foreign-policy concerns, to abandon plans to exploit racial divisions in upcoming contests.

Cazayoux was an attractive candidate with deep Louisiana roots, while Jenkins was a controversial figure even in Republican circles — in no small part because of his past ties to former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke. And still the final result was a close one.

That has encouraged National Republican Congressional Committee, which argued that the anti-Obama campaigning helped Jenkins make up “substantial ground” in the closing days of the contest.

“This election speaks to the potential toxicity of an Obama candidacy and the possible drag he could have down-ballot this fall,” argued the NRCC team in a memo that, despite its sore-loser tone, makes clear the intention of the Republican party to make the fall campaign one very long, and very ugly, “Willie Horton” ad.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x