The Case for Nuclear Abolition

The Case for Nuclear Abolition

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Nation‘s Jonathan Schell has spent the better part of a enormously productive career making the case for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

The new president seems more open to this message than any of his Oval Office predecessors, stating clearly on the campaign trail that, “This is the moment to begin the work of seeking the peace of a world without nuclear weapons.” And Obama isn’t alone, nor can nuclear abolition still be painted as a partisan liberal issue when former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George Schultz, among many other credentialed conservatives, have joined the cause.

Huge practical problems have to first be addressed before the threat of these weapons of mass destruction can be eliminated but there’s more reason for hope than perhaps ever before. Katrina vanden Heuvel wrote about an important and inspiring new international group gaining traction, Global Zero, which launched in Europe a few months ago with a goal of taking on these problems and eliminating all nuclear weapons in 20 to 25 years.

In this country, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is pushing the issue with a new video contest offering $1,000 to the first-prize winner. The contest? Simply answer this question in a video of three minutes or less: How can we achieve a world free of nuclear weapons by the year 2020? You can view the entries here.

I like this one…

Check out the contest site if you want to submit a video and/or find further resources. The deadline is June 15. The contest is open to activists of all ages.


PS: If you have extra time on your hands and want to follow me on Twitter — a micro-blog — click here. You’ll find (slightly) more personal posts, breaking news and lots of links.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x