California Recall, Cont.

California Recall, Cont.

“We don’t have a Bush v.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

“We don’t have a Bush v. Gore problem,” Judge Alex Kozinski declared as the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided to let California’s October 7 vote go forward on whether to recall Governor Gray Davis and with whom to replace him if the recall passes. Sweeping aside equal-protection concerns, the eleven-judge panel unanimously overturned an earlier decision to delay the election because evidence suggested that flawed punch-card systems in six counties might disfranchise as many as 40,000 voters. Instead, the judges decided that the harm done to the public by postponing the recall would be greater than the harm done by using faulty machines.

Kozinski’s declaration referred to the 2000 presidential election debacle in Florida, where thousands of voters–most of them from counties that strongly supported Al Gore–were disqualified because of flawed voting systems, bad ballot designs and officials who seemed more zealous about preventing voters from casting ballots than getting an accurate count. But this isn’t just about Florida, or California. Voters are disfranchised all the time; Florida made the news–and the courts–only because control of the White House came down to a few votes. That’s why Congress must establish universal voting and vote-counting standards that assure that ballots cast anywhere in America carry the same weight.

Now the drama in California moves from the courts back to the candidates. Polls suggest that with the help of former President Clinton, former Vice President Gore, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and most of the candidates for next year’s Democratic presidential nomination, Davis is having some success in making the recall vote a referendum on the Republican Party’s penchant for gaming the system. That focus conveniently skirts the fact that Davis remains an extremely unpopular figure. On the matter of who should replace him, Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger’s celebrity appeal has not yet converted to the poll numbers his backers anticipated–at least in part because a lot of California Republicans prefer right-wing purist Tom McClintock. Democrat Cruz Bustamante has kept even with Schwarzenegger so far, but his grab-it-all approach to fundraising has caught up with him–a county judge just told him to stop dipping into an old campaign account and to return the $4 million in it to donors. Independent Arianna Huffington, though an attractive candidate, has yet to catch fire.

This recall election was staged by right-wing insiders and millionaires. It did not spring from the grassroots. But now that it’s on, at least let’s hope all the votes are counted.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x