Is Bipartisanship Bad for Healthcare?

Is Bipartisanship Bad for Healthcare?

The Nation‘s Chris Hayes points out that conservative senators have little reason to vote for a healthcare reform, and Republicans will run against the bill in 2010 no matter what.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Nation‘s Washington editor, Chris Hayes, talks to Keith
Olbermann on Countdown about bipartisanship in healthcare reform.
While President Obama and prominent Democrats like Max
Baucus
reach out to Republicans on the Hill and play insider
games
, Hayes notes, they have largely forgotten what made the
Obama campaign special and put them in power in the first place: people-powered
organizing
. Hayes points out that conservative senators like Chuck
Grassley and Mike Enzi have little reason to vote for a healthcare
bill, and Republicans will run against the healthcare bill in 2010 no
matter what, so wasting time on bipartisanship instead of focusing on
passing the best possible bill is a bad idea. The real political
benefit, he notes, will come from making people’s lives better.

Sarah Jaffe

Check out more great Nation videos on our YouTube channel.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x