The Beat

The Beat

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

CIVIL RIGHTS REFORM As House Republican leaders thwarted debate on the tepid Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform bill, the

NAACP

convention chose a radically different course by endorsing full public financing of campaigns. Noting that 95 percent of campaign contributions in excess of $200 come from white givers, the NAACP resolution declared that the current system “unfairly dilutes the political strength of African-Americans in participating in political parties, elections and the passage of legislation.” Says Georgia NAACP state conference president

Walter Butler

, “We know that [campaign finance reform] is a civil rights issue that should be dealt with as other civil rights issues in the past.” The NAACP vote came as Congressional Black Caucus members were questioning, and in some cases opposing, milder reforms. “There’s a lot of skepticism, a lot of fear that campaign finance reform, if it’s done wrong, could end up hurting black candidates,” says

Fannie Lou Hamer Project

executive director

Stephanie Wilson

. “We’ve spent a lot of time arguing that only with public financing can African-American candidates really break through the barriers.” In North Carolina the

National Voting Rights Institute

has sued the state on behalf of the NAACP and other groups, arguing that costly campaigns serve as a “poll tax,” violating constitutional guarantees that economic status should not serve as a barrier to political participation…. An assist for the new drive comes from

Adonal Foyle

, center for the NBA’s Golden State Warriors. Foyle founded

Democracy Matters

, whose fifteen coordinators will build support on college campuses for public financing. Foyle argues that if players had to buy their way into the NBA, people wouldn’t take it seriously. Yet “that’s what has happened in politics.”

MASSACHUSETTS MISCHIEF Massachusetts voters in 1998 overwhelmingly endorsed a Clean Elections initiative designed to flush special-interest money out of politics. But public financing only functions when legislators allocate the money for it. The Massachusetts Senate did that by a 36-2 vote, but powerful House Speaker Thomas Finneran is balking, even as 2002 races for governor and other posts get under way. “I used to think Massachusetts was an initiative state before I met the Massachusetts legislature,” says

David Donnelly

, of

Massachusetts Voters for Clean Elections

, which has been organizing protests and rallies. Outside Boston’s historic Faneuil Hall, former Attorney General

Scott Harshbarger

, who now heads

Common Cause

, urged legislators to “remember they were elected by the people, not by Tom Finneran.” US Representative

Marty Meehan

said, “When I see Democrats playing games at the State House, I say that’s the best weapon they can give the Republicans for the next election.”

ALTERNATIVE POLITICS Campaign finance reform isn’t the only electoral change on the agenda this summer. By a 10-1 vote the San Francisco Board of Supervisors set a March 2002 referendum on adopting instant-runoff voting (IRV) for local posts. IRV, devised as an alternative to winner-take-all elections, allows voters to rank candidates for an office. If a first-choice candidate is eliminated, the vote automatically transfers to the second choice. A San Francisco win “could put instant-runoff voting on the radar across the country,” says

Rob Richie

of the

Center for Voting and Democracy

. Vermont, Alaska and New Mexico are also considering IRV proposals…. Another alternative, cumulative voting, under which voters apportion their votes among candidates, has earned enthusiastic support from an Illinois task force chaired by former GOP Governor

Jim Edgar

and former Democratic Representative (and federal judge)

Abner Mikva

. The state once had a cumulative system, but it was scrapped twenty-one years ago as part of a move to downsize the legislature. Since the change, Illinois has witnessed dramatic declines in the number of contested legislative races and in voter turnout.

RELIGIOUS LEFT The

Unitarian Universalist Association

‘s new president,

William Sinkford

, left no doubt about what his promise of “radical fellowship” would mean for the 220,000-member denomination. “During my presidency, our Unitarian Universalist voice will support racial justice and gender justice and equal rights for our bisexual, gay, lesbian and transgender brothers and sisters,” Sinkford announced in a speech following his election as the predominantly white religious group’s first African-American leader. “We will speak for responsible stewardship of the environment. And we will work to redress the economic injustices that plague our society.” The denomination’s Cleveland general assembly voted to make economic globalization a primary issue for 1,050 UU congregations, following an appeal from

Chuck Collins

of

United for a Fair Economy

and strong support from the convention’s large youth caucus. With Congress expected to act this year on granting President Bush fast-track authority to negotiate a Free Trade Agreement of the Americas,

Unitarian Universalists for a Just Economic Community

is gearing up a grassroots education and lobbying push to challenge trade policies that Collins says “are about profits, not values.”

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x