April 14, 1939: John Steinbeck Publishes ‘The Grapes of Wrath’

April 14, 1939: John Steinbeck Publishes ‘The Grapes of Wrath’

April 14, 1939: John Steinbeck Publishes ‘The Grapes of Wrath’

"The chapters in which Steinbeck halts the story to editorialize about American life are sometimes useful, but oftener pretentious and flatulent."

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In 1936, Steinbeck had published in The Nation a report, “Dubious Battle in California,” on the perils facing migrant workers in California (it is included in our 150th-anniversary issue). Steinbeck was named in The Nation’s Honor Roll for 1939 (an ongoing Nation tradition) for “dramatizing…the desperate plight of the migratory farm worker in California and the political and economic forces arrayed against him.” In the same paragraph, future Nation editor Carey McWilliams was cited for “documenting“ the same in his non-fiction work, Factories in the Field, often considered a non-fictional accompaniment to Grapes of Wrath. Steinbeck’s opus was pointedly (and, the editor of The Almanac would aver, justly) tweaked in the Nation of April 15, 1939 by the critic Louis Kronenberger, in a review titled “Hungry Caravan.”

The Grapes of Wrath is a superb tract because it exposes something terrible and true with enormous vigor. It is a superb tract, moreover, by virtue of being thoroughly animated fiction, by virtue of living scenes and living characters (like Ma), not by virtue of discursive homilies and dead characters (like the socialistic preacher). One comes away moved, indignant, protesting, pitying. But one comes away dissatisfied, too, aware that The Grapes of Wrath is too unevenly weighted, too uneconomically proportioned, the work of a writer who is still self-indulgent, still undisciplined, still not altogether aware of the difference in value of various human emotions. The picturesqueness of the Joads, for example, is fine wherever it makes them live more abundantly, but false when simply laid on for effect. Steinbeck’s sentimentalism is good in bringing him close to the lives of his people, but bad when it blurs his insight. Again, the chapters in which Steinbeck halts the story to editorialize about American life are sometimes useful, but oftener pretentious and flatulent.

April 14, 1939

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Time is running out to have your gift matched 

In this time of unrelenting, often unprecedented cruelty and lawlessness, I’m grateful for Nation readers like you. 

So many of you have taken to the streets, organized in your neighborhood and with your union, and showed up at the ballot box to vote for progressive candidates. You’re proving that it is possible—to paraphrase the legendary Patti Smith—to redeem the work of the fools running our government.

And as we head into 2026, I promise that The Nation will fight like never before for justice, humanity, and dignity in these United States. 

At a time when most news organizations are either cutting budgets or cozying up to Trump by bringing in right-wing propagandists, The Nation’s writers, editors, copy editors, fact-checkers, and illustrators confront head-on the administration’s deadly abuses of power, blatant corruption, and deconstruction of both government and civil society. 

We couldn’t do this crucial work without you.

Through the end of the year, a generous donor is matching all donations to The Nation’s independent journalism up to $75,000. But the end of the year is now only days away. 

Time is running out to have your gift doubled. Don’t wait—donate now to ensure that our newsroom has the full $150,000 to start the new year. 

Another world really is possible. Together, we can and will win it!

Love and Solidarity,

John Nichols 

Executive Editor, The Nation

Ad Policy
x