Want to Hear Calls to ‘Bring the Troops Home’? Listen to GOP Presidential Debate

Want to Hear Calls to ‘Bring the Troops Home’? Listen to GOP Presidential Debate

Want to Hear Calls to ‘Bring the Troops Home’? Listen to GOP Presidential Debate

The first Republican presidential debate featured clear calls from two candidates to respond to the death of Osama bin Laden by exiting Afghanistan.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The first Republican presidential debate might not have been illuminating on every front.

But it did feature some of the bluntest talk yet heard on national media – especially the debate’s host, Fox News – about the right response to the killing of Osama bin Laden.

Two candidates came down for the rapid – make that very nearly immediate – withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

Asked how United States should respond to the Osama’s end, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum essentially endorsed the Washington-insider “stay the course” line with regard to Afghanistan.

Retired CEO Herman Cain, who tried to play the role of Donald Trump in the debate, admitted that: "At this point, I don’t know all the facts."

But Texas Congressman Ron Paul and former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson had the facts. And they had the right answers.

Asked whether the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan occupation might have helped with the search for Osama bin Laden, Paul responded: “Absolutely not. [Bin Laden] wasn’t caught in Afghanistan. Nation-building in Afghanistan and telling those people how to live and getting involved in running their country hardly had anything to do with finding the information where he was being held in a country that we give billions of dollars of foreign aid to, at the same time we are bombing that country.”

“So it’s the policy that is at fault. Not having the troops in Afghanistan wouldn’t have hurt,” continued the congressman, who has cosponsored proposals to bring the troops home. “We went to Afghanistan to get him, and he hasn’t been there. Now that he’s killed, boy, it is a wonderful time for this country now to reassess it, get the troops out of Afghanistan and end that war that hasn’t helped us and hasn’t helped anybody in the Middle East.”

That produced the first big round of applause for any of the candidates from the conservative audience that attended the debate in South Carolina.

But it was quickly followed by applause for Johnson, who detailed his opposition to the U.S. missions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

The former governor acknowledged that he initially supported the Afghanistan mission, saying: "We were attacked. We attacked back. That’s what our military is for, and after six months, I think we pretty effectively had taken care of al Qaeda." 

"But," he added, "that was 10 years ago. We are building roads, schools, bridges and highways in Iraq and Afghanistan and borrowing 43 cents out of every dollar do that. In my opinion, this is crazy."

Cue the applause.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x