Government Shutdown Will Be Bad for Both Parties

Government Shutdown Will Be Bad for Both Parties

Government Shutdown Will Be Bad for Both Parties

On Bloggingheads, Ari Berman says that the Obama Administration has failed to steer the debate on economic issues to the Democrats’ advantage.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Nation‘s Ari Berman joined Politico‘s Ben Smith for a Bloggingheads conversation about the increasing possibility of a government shutdown. Berman says that "For the longest time I felt like there was never going to be a government shutdown. This was all just posturing by both sides to try to get the best deal." But, in the last few days, Berman is no longer sure this is the case.

Both sides have now agreed to cuts of $33 billion, with Democrats taking a "scalpel approach" to cuts while the GOP is working to win much more "sweeping" cuts. But, in a late night meeting on Wednesday, Obama, Reid and Boehner failed to come to an agreement on how to avert a shutdown. Plus, as Berman explains, the Tea Party will not budge or come to an agreement—they want a shutdown.

These political games, according to Berman, are bad for both Democrats and Republicans. Unfortunately, President Barack Obama has allowed the conversation to be about whose cuts are better instead of resetting the debate to call attention to the need to create jobs and get the economy moving again. Obama hasn’t taken charge of the conversation surrounding budget cuts, and a lot of the "nuance" of his position on cuts is being lost on most Americans.

—Kevin Gosztola

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x