Palin in Iowa, Palin in Iowa… ‘Oh My Goodness!’ Is This a Caucus State?

Palin in Iowa, Palin in Iowa… ‘Oh My Goodness!’ Is This a Caucus State?

Palin in Iowa, Palin in Iowa… ‘Oh My Goodness!’ Is This a Caucus State?

Maybe a presidential candidate, maybe not, but definitely spending a lot of time in the first-caucus state.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Sarah Palin may still be a presidential tease.
 
But she is deadly serious about how and where she does her teasing. Just ask any Iowan.

The former governor of Alaska says she might run for the Republican Party’s 2012 presidential nomination—in a process all but certain to begin with Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucuses.

And Palin says she thinks she would win.

But Palin isn’t running. Not really. Not yet.

She’s just spending a lot of time in, um, Iowa.

To be fair, she is lauching a national tour for her new just-in-time-for-Christmas tomeAmerica By Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag (Harpers)—and she has to start somewhere. So why not Des Moines? And, um, Spirit Lake? 

The 2008 Republican nominee for vice president spent three hours hawking books to Hawkeyes at a Des Moines Borders store last week. 

She’ll be back in Iowa for this week for that stop at the Walmart Superstore out on Highway 9/71 in Spirit Lake.

Not many authors make it all the way to Spirit Lake, population 4,261.

But a presidential candidate, well, yes, presidential candidates do find their way to Spirit Lake, which happens to be in the rich Republican heartland that sends ultra-conservative Republican Congressman Steve King to Washington.

But ask if this has anything to do with the fact that Iowa is the first-caucus state and you don’t get much.

All Palin gave reporters in Des Moines was a quick: "Oh my goodness!"

So she is not running. Not really. Not yet.

But she is beating the GOP’s other presidential teases—at least at the cash registers. According to the manager of the Des Moines Borders store, Palin far outdrew former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who won the 2008 GOP caucuses in the state, and former House speaker Newt Gingrich, who pioneered the "I-might-run-for-president-so-you-better-up-my-lecture-fee" schtick that some think Palin had adopted.

But book-selling is one thing—and Palin’s book is better than Newt’s, even if it is not quite as good as Huckabee’s new kid’s book.

What about the polls?

The serious polling of Iowa has yet to get going.

But we’ve got some data.

For instance, the usually quite reliable Iowa Poll by the Des Moines Register has never put Palin in first place among Iowa Republicans.

But they like her.

An older Iowa Poll, which compared favorables and unfavorables, found that 68 percent of Iowa Republicans viewed Palin avorably, while 24 percent had an unfavorable take on the hockey mom/millionaire media maven.

That, argued the Register, made her "a credible candidate for the 2012 caucuses should she decide to run for president."

But Iowa Republicans still prefer Huckabee. His ratings in the same poll were 70 percent favorable to just 12 percent unfavorable.

An Iowa Republican website straw poll, conducted over the summer, had Huckabee besting Palin by a 2-1 margin.

Even Gingrich and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney ran better than Palin.

"Oh my goodness!"

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x