Dems Fail to Curtail Bank Reform Debate

Dems Fail to Curtail Bank Reform Debate

Dems Fail to Curtail Bank Reform Debate

Harry Reid tried to shut down the debate on financial services reform. Republicans and responsible Democrats blocked the move. They were right to do so.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is in a rush to pass financial services regulatory reform legislation—even if the reforms are insufficient to protect consumers and avoid another meltdown moment.

Senate Banking Committee chair Chris Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat who is ready to retire, is similarly inclined.

Reid and Dodd thought they had the 60 votes they needed to end the debate on reforming the way that Wall Street does business. They even had some Republican allies who were willing to back a cloture call.

But when the cloture vote came Wednesday afternoon, Reid could only muster 57 votes—those of 55 Democratic caucus members and Republicans Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine.

Where were the other three Democratic votes that Reid needed?

Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter did not vote, presumably because he was still recovering from his not-a-victory party after Tuesday´s Democratic primary loss.

But the two key `no´ votes came from two Democrats who have been supporters of real reform—Wisconsin´s Russ Feingold and Washington´s Maria Cantwell.

Said Feingold: “After thirty years of giving in to the wishes of Wall Street lobbyists, Congress needs to finally enact tough reforms to prevent Wall Street from driving our economy into the ditch again.  We need to eliminate the risk posed to our economy by ‘too big to fail’ financial firms and to reinstate the protective firewalls between Main Street banks and Wall Street firms.  Unfortunately, these key reforms are not included in the bill.  The test for this legislation is a simple one – whether it will prevent another financial crisis.  As the bill stands, it fails that test.  Ending debate on the bill is finishing before the job is done."

Feingold, one of only eight senators who had the good sense to vote in 1999 against tearing apart the regulatory structure that Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his congressional allies erected as a firewall between Wall Street investment firms and Main Street banks, is of course correct.

Reid and Dodd want to pass a bill—no matter how lame the legislation may be.

Feingold and Cantwell want real reform. And the American people should hope they get it.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x