Celebrating the Fourth by Remembering the Fifth

Celebrating the Fourth by Remembering the Fifth

Celebrating the Fourth by Remembering the Fifth

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Other than consuming copious amounts of beer and barbecue food, what can Americans do on the Fourth of July to celebrate their freedom? Erwin Knoll, the late editor of The Progressive, used to pin a copy of the Bill of Rights to a tree at the parties he hosted. I’m not hosting any parties, and I’ll spare you a virtual posting of the entire Bill of Rights, save for the Fifth Amendment, which merits special attention because Democrats and Republicans seem to have forgotten what it says. Here, then, is the forgotten fifth:

 

 

No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

Many of us thought due process was going to be recognized as part of the Constitution again when Barack Obama was elected President. Unfortunately, as Charlie Savage of The New York Times reminded us this week, it’s looking increasingly like Obama is leaning toward detaining terrorism suspects without trial even after Guantanomo is shut down (if it ever is), among other policies eerily reminiscent of his predecessor’s. The most chilling quote in Savage’s article came from Jack Balkin, a professor at Yale Law School, who suggested Obama is putting a bipartisan stamp on detention and surveillance policies that liberals and Democrats overwhelmingly opposed when Bush was in office. "What we are watching is a liberal, centrist, Democratic version of the construction of these same governing practices," said Balkin of Obama’s approach.

That’s not "Change We Can Believe In." It is alarming and, as all progressives should remind themselves on Independence Day, profoundly un-American.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x