“No Deal” on the Bailout

“No Deal” on the Bailout

It is probably unfair to say that John McCain’s decision to steer the presidential race off the campaign trail and into the White House jinxed the deal to bail out the nation’s troubled economy.

Then again…

The much-heralded meeting between President Bush, the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees and congressional leaders– which came together after McCain’s Wednesday announcement that he was suspending campaigning until a deal was done–did not produce anything in the way of progress.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

It is probably unfair to say that John McCain’s decision to steer the presidential race off the campaign trail and into the White House jinxed the deal to bail out the nation’s troubled economy.

Then again…

The much-heralded meeting between President Bush, the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees and congressional leaders– which came together after McCain’s Wednesday announcement that he was suspending campaigning until a deal was done–did not produce anything in the way of progress.

While House Banking Committee chairman Barney Frank and Senate Banking Committee chair Chris Dodd had suggested earlier Thursday that an agreement had been reached, the ranking Republican on the Senate committee, Alabama’s Richard Shelby, said there was “no deal.”

The big area of disagreement on whether to go ahead with some variation of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s $700 billion scheme appears to involve the issue of “executive compensation” – i.e., whether the Wall Street executives whose greed created the current mess will pocket some substantial portion of the bailout money.

The fact that the presence of Obama and McCain did nothing to advance the congressional negotiations with regard to the deal–and may actually have screwed them up–simply confirms Frank’s astute assessment that McCain’s decision to add the presidential candidates to the mix was a “distraction.”

Of course, that’s not the only distraction.

McCain’s Wednesday announcement that he would suspend campaigning and, apparently, skip Friday night’s presidential debate in Oxford, Mississippi, unless there was an agreement on the bailout, means that what happens–or does not happen–in Washington now becomes a distraction from the campaign.

How much remains to be seen.

But one thing is certain: Whether McCain goes to Oxford or not, Obama will be there.

Indeed, the Democrat suggests, he’s open to turning what would have been a debate into a town hall meeting on the economy.

Not a bad idea, actually. And probably more productive than today’s charade of a meeting at the White House.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x