Tootsie

Tootsie

Twenty-five years before Katy Perry, Jessica Lange kisses a girl and it feels good, even if it is Dustin Hoffman.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Everett CollectionDustin Hoffman in Tootsie, 1982.

Twenty-five years before Katy Perry, Jessica Lange kisses a girl and it feels good, even if it is Dustin Hoffman.

Dustin Hoffman’s hilarious performance in Tootsie is being somewhat hilariously overanalyzed in the press. The movie is a knockabout farce, based on the not unfamiliar theme of the desperate chap who tries to escape his particular predicament by donning wig, skirts and a conspicuous pair of falsies. It may be more profound than Charley’s Aunt or Some Like It Hot, but it hardly demands elucidation.

The reason for the probing is that, in the manner of Woody Allen, Hoffman is here spinning a yarn which, if it does not parallel, at least impinges upon aspects of his own life. Michael Dorsey (Hoffman) is an actor who, though well regarded in the profession, cannot get a job in anything from soaps to Shakespeare. The trouble is that Dorsey is a perfectionist – and an outspoken one. He can be counted on to destroy any production schedule by repeated arguments on fine points of psychological probability or narrative logic. Hoffman has that sort of reputation, and in his early days, before The Graduate won him a following that has since become an army, it cost him many jobs. Early in Tootsie, Dorsey’s agent tells him that he is unemployable on any stage in the country and that he’d better get a job as a waiter. The agent is played by Sydney Pollack, who also directed the film, and the scene fairly jumps from the screen because you sense that the two men are shouting at each other through their characters. A few minutes later, shadow-boxing his way downtown, Dorsey suddenly yells, “I’m a great character actor; I can play anybody!” In Tootsie, Hoffman proves that he just about can.

Because what makes the movie such fun is that his Dorothy Michaels is not just Michael Dorsey in drag. She soon becomes an authentic, if bizarre, character in her own right, one who for long stretches dominates the action and turns the story on its ear. Having landed a job on a daytime TV serial, she rewrites the script as the cameras roll. This confuses the other actors and enrages the male-chauvinist director (Dabney Coleman), but the delighted viewers flood the studio with fan mail for Dorothy. And, unused to the indignities suffered by her sex, she instructs the men with whom she deals in the virtues of equal rights and mutual courtesy. No one on the screen doubts that the crusading Ms. Michaels is quite a dame, and the audience in the movie theater comes to much the same opinion.

Of course, the picture resounds with the clatter of slapstick. I won’t spoil it by going into detail, but to give an idea of the suffering imposed on Dorsey by his unflappable doppelgänger, there comes a moment in the action when a new friend (Jessica Lange) becomes convinced that Dorothy is a lesbian, while his longtime friend (Teri Garr) is persuaded that Michael is gay. Problems of identity, as well as principles of equality, predictably arise in the movie, and these may well relate to Hoffman’s own convictions. But they could sink a farce if they got the upper hand. What makes Tootsie take off and fly is his almost absurd dexterity as a character actor.

The story is by Don McGuire and Larry Gelbart, the screenplay by Gelbart and Murray Schisgal. I suspect that Hoffman was not bashful with advice.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x