Bread, Roses and the Flood

Bread, Roses and the Flood

The only bright spot in this man-made disaster has been the wave of public outrage at the Administration’s failure to provide aid to the most vulnerable.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This time the Bush Administration could not hide the dead bodies–or the walking wounded whose abandonment by American society began not in the hurricane’s wake but many years earlier.

The only bright spot in this man-made disaster has been the wave of public outrage at the Administration’s abject failure to provide aid to the most vulnerable. Indeed, it is hard to think of a time, other than at the height of the civil rights movement, when the plight of poor black Southerners so deeply stirred the conscience of the nation. Perhaps Hurricane Katrina will go down in history alongside Bull Connor’s fire hoses in Birmingham and the Alabama Highway Patrol’s nightsticks at Selma as a catalyst for a new national self-awareness regarding the unfinished struggle for racial justice.

But a better historical analogy, although not one that immediately springs to mind, may be the Lawrence, Massachusetts, strike of 1912, best known for giving the labor movement the slogan “bread and roses.” Thousands of poor immigrant workers walked off their jobs in the city’s giant woolen mills to protest a wage reduction. Bill Haywood, leader of the Industrial Workers of the World, who had been invited in to help direct the strike, devised a plan to send the workers’ children to live with sympathetic families in other cities for the duration. The sight of the pale, emaciated children marching up Fifth Avenue transformed public opinion regarding the strike (leading the governor of Massachusetts to pressure the mill owners to accede to the workers’ demands). More important, even though by 1912 the Progressive Era was well under way, the marches broadened public support for efforts to uplift the poor and placed the question of poverty, and the federal government’s obligation to combat it, front and center in the presidential campaign of 1912.

“I have worked in the slums of New York,” wrote Margaret Sanger, “but I have never found children who were so uniformly ill-nourished, ill-fed and ill-clothed.” Today, as in 1912, the shameful (and growing) presence of poverty has been thrust from invisibility onto the center stage of national discussion. Let’s hope the country finally awakens to the consequences of years of trickle-down economics, tax cuts for the rich, privatization of public responsibilities and the demonization of government and the poor.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x