Lee Scott, What a Charmer!

Lee Scott, What a Charmer!

At Wal-Mart’s annual shareholders meeting, the company blames workers for its public relations disasters.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Friday was the company’s annual meeting, and, as expected, officials had to address the ongoing firestorm of criticism of Wal-Mart’s practices, and the well-organized national campaigns [link to wakeupwalmart.com and walmartwatch.com] backed by labor and other social justice groups. Did CEO Lee Scott assure his employees that he was listening, and that Wal-Mart was doing everything it could to make the company a more humane place to work? Did he promise to unveil a compensation plan that would keep workers and their families off welfare? No, Scott, who last week denied reports that his job was in danger, did something even more astonishing: he blamed the workers themselves for the recent spate of public relations disasters. “You better be ready to be better,” he told them. In another gem of sage advice, Scott offered that “associates” should be “doing the right things and doing things right.”

Though there were the usual raucous cheers–among workers, only true believers get to attend the meeting–the mood of the crowd was not quite blindly adoring. Shareholders and workers applauded Martha Burk, chair of the National Council of Women’s Organizations, when she chided the company for having so few women on its thirteen-person board of directors (only one), and called on the company to disclose race and gender data on the distribution of stock options. Still, her resolution was voted down. (Socially conscious resolutions usually lose, not just at Wal-Mart, but at most companies.)

In other news, Wal-Mart is hoping to win back the good will of the American people by…sponsoring a reality show. Admittedly, the strategy has worked for Anna Nicole Smith and Kirstie Alley, both of whom did have some image problems, albeit mild ones: they were has-beens of less-than-svelte girth. Wal-Mart has far more to overcome.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x