The Activist Response

The Activist Response

When the FDA recently released its proposed new rules regarding genetically engineered foods Greenpeace and the Center for Food Safety didn’t like the taste.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When the FDA recently released its proposed new rules regarding genetically engineered foods Greenpeace and the Center for Food Safety didn’t like the taste. Instead of requiring strict safety testing, the FDA rules compel producers merely to notify the agency 120 days before marketing a GE product. There is no requirement that manufacturers label GE foods. The FDA leaves that decision up to the producers. Now how many are going to note their foods were DNA-altered? Biotech champions, like Monsanto, maintain that genetically engineered foods are safe, but skeptics point to the recent fiasco with StarLink corn to support the argument that the public is at risk without government regulation. Doctors and scientists warn that GE foods could trigger allergies, and point to the recent case of a woman who suffered from anaphylactic shock after eating a taco shell containing the recalled StarLink corn. Today, most of the safety testing of GE products is conducted–if at all–by the corporations responsible for them. Greenpeace Genetic Engineering Specialist, Charles Margulis, maintains that without testing there is no way of knowing that GE foods are safe. Greenpeace and The Center for Food Safety are petitioning the FDA to change the rules, and through postcard and web campaigns hope to bring hundreds of thousands of complaints to the agency before April third when the public comment period on premarket notice ends. Concerned citizens can petition the FDA by visiting the Center for Food Safety’s website at www.centerforfoodsafety.org, or Greenpeace at www.greenpeaceusa.org.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x