The Activist Response

The Activist Response

When the FDA recently released its proposed new rules regarding genetically engineered foods Greenpeace and the Center for Food Safety didn’t like the taste.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When the FDA recently released its proposed new rules regarding genetically engineered foods Greenpeace and the Center for Food Safety didn’t like the taste. Instead of requiring strict safety testing, the FDA rules compel producers merely to notify the agency 120 days before marketing a GE product. There is no requirement that manufacturers label GE foods. The FDA leaves that decision up to the producers. Now how many are going to note their foods were DNA-altered? Biotech champions, like Monsanto, maintain that genetically engineered foods are safe, but skeptics point to the recent fiasco with StarLink corn to support the argument that the public is at risk without government regulation. Doctors and scientists warn that GE foods could trigger allergies, and point to the recent case of a woman who suffered from anaphylactic shock after eating a taco shell containing the recalled StarLink corn. Today, most of the safety testing of GE products is conducted–if at all–by the corporations responsible for them. Greenpeace Genetic Engineering Specialist, Charles Margulis, maintains that without testing there is no way of knowing that GE foods are safe. Greenpeace and The Center for Food Safety are petitioning the FDA to change the rules, and through postcard and web campaigns hope to bring hundreds of thousands of complaints to the agency before April third when the public comment period on premarket notice ends. Concerned citizens can petition the FDA by visiting the Center for Food Safety’s website at www.centerforfoodsafety.org, or Greenpeace at www.greenpeaceusa.org.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x