What Are They Reading?

What Are They Reading?

John Steinbeck’s forlorn protagonists, Lennie and George, summon few comparisons in today’s landscape of mainstream literary fiction, overstocked with tales of redemption.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

OF MICE AND MEN.
By John Steinbeck.
Penguin. 107 pp. $8.

John Steinbeck’s forlorn protagonists, Lennie and George, summon few comparisons in today’s landscape of mainstream literary fiction, overstocked with tales of redemption. The rapidly consolidating book business seems fixated on soft stories of hope, on the one hand, and celebrity memoirs and biographies, on the other. It’s easy to forget how many American classics are not fundamentally palliative in tone. (My loose definition of classic is broad and inclusive.) While visiting my parents recently, I spotted Of Mice and Men on their bookshelf and promptly buried my head in this raw, tightly crafted and disconsolate tale of human loneliness.

Originally published in 1937, Of Mice and Men opens with two men hunting for work along the California countryside. George is a sympathetic and alienated dreamer, while Lennie is a lumbering man of slow mind, an old-school “gentle giant.” In a bunk house filled with other rootless job-seekers, Lennie’s burden of simplemindedness leads him to commit a hideous crime. Much like the fate of Bigger Thomas in Richard Wright’s Native Son (published three years after Of Mice and Men), Lennie’s act thrusts him into a tremendous despair from which he must flee–though he cannot escape.

Neither Steinbeck nor Wright dwelled too much on themes of redemption and personal emancipation in these deeply provocative and disturbing novels. In Of Mice and Men, it is Crooks, a black stable hand living as an outcast among the white laborers, who most eloquently expresses a soul-stirring despondence:

“S’pose you didn’t have nobody. S’pose you couldn’t go into the bunk house and play rummy ’cause you was black. How’d you like that?… A guy needs somebody–to be near him…. A guy goes nuts if he ain’t got nobody…I tell ya a guy gets too lonely an’ he gets sick.”

The tragic realism in this and other American classics is becoming a rarity. In the book business of 2003, novelists delving into human sadness are routinely dismissed by agents and editors as “too dark.” This is a standard not borne by John Steinbeck, Richard Wright, Zora Neale Hurston, William Faulkner, Langston Hughes, James Jones, Flannery O’Connor or Ernest Hemingway–all of whom wrote astonishingly sorrowful classics. And it is not just the literary establishment that is trying to whitewash the human psyche: During the 1990s, Of Mice and Men became one of the most banned books in high schools across America. In one highly publicized case, an Arizona principal yanked the novel from the English curriculum due to “profane language, moral statement, treatment of the retarded, and the violent ending.” This sounds like “opposition” presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman talking with First Librarian Laura Bush about the lyrical content of an Eminem album as war brews.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x