In Our Orbit

In Our Orbit

“Ifavor unconditional withdrawal from the territories,” says a former head of Israel’s security service, rather starkly, given his background. It’s from an interview in this edited collection o

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

“Ifavor unconditional withdrawal from the territories,” says a former head of Israel’s security service, rather starkly, given his background. It’s from an interview in this edited collection of short opinion pieces from Israel and the occupied territories. “Israeli society, top to bottom, is sinking into confusion,” says the official, Ami Ayalon. “There are no reference points.” It might be said instead that the standard reference points don’t tell the whole story, which is the corrective purpose of this reader, edited by Nation copy chief Roane Carey and former intern Jonathan Shainin. The editors have recruited a diverse assemblage of correspondents on various aspects of politics, culture and the dirty war being conducted on both sides. Most, unsurprisingly, score Ariel Sharon heavily–Tanya Reinhart, a professor and columnist for Yediot Ahronot, says Sharon’s plans are for “the second half of 1948,” i.e., expulsion; Michael Ben-Yair, attorney general in several governments in the 1990s, observes that “the Six-Day War was forced upon us; however, the war’s seventh day, which began on June 12, 1967 and has continued to this day, is the product of our choice. We enthusiastically chose to become a colonial society.” Philosopher Adi Ophir says of the intifada, “The occupied party’s resistance to the occupier is its moral right. Its violent resistance to the occupation is a direct result of the violence of the occupation…. The Palestinians have no choice but to resist.” We hear from an activist about lying in front of tanks (“We don’t bother to argue with [the soldiers] or explain”) and from former soldiers themselves (“All the IDF’s operations in the territories are approaching the red line…. I cannot judge what is legal and what constitutes a war crime,” says a onetime air force pilot). And Amira Hass’s “What Kind of War Is This?”, a report from Jenin, lucidly answers its own question.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x